Paine, along with many revolutionaries of the period, viewed government as being inherently limited, in the sense that it was meant to serve the people and not the other way around. That's why he wrote "common sense" which talked about the absurdity of British rule over the colonies.
Because it was clear that not all votes were counted for the revote?!.
<span>The answer would be C. The straightest reading of Locke's radical philosophy bargains the concept of consent frolicking a dominant role. His examination instigates with individuals in a state of nature where they are not topic to a shared genuine authority with the control to enact or arbitrate arguments.</span>