1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darya [45]
3 years ago
7

Describe Vargas’ second trip to New Mexico. How did the Pueblo’s respond?

History
2 answers:
Brums [2.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Vargas returned to New Mexico two years after his first visit. He came with 100 soldiers, 70 families, 18 friars, and livestock. The settlers were not welcomed by the Pueblo Indians and Vargas discovered that the pledges of friendship he received two years earlier were not going to be honored.

Explanation:

hram777 [196]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Vargas returned to New Mexico two years after his first visit. He came with 100 soldiers, 70 families, 18 friars, and livestock. The settlers were not welcomed by the Pueblo Indians and Vargas discovered that the pledges of friendship he received two years earlier were not going to be honored.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unne
MaRussiya [10]

As we celebrate the 4th of July, let's ask the question: Did the Framers make a mistake by amending the Constitution with the Bill of Rights? Would Americans have more liberty today had there not been a Bill of Rights? You say, "Williams, what's wrong with you? America without the Bill of Rights is unthinkable!" Let's look at it.

After the 1787 Constitutional Convention, there were intense ratification debates about the proposed Constitution. Both James Madison and Alexander Hamilton expressed grave reservations about Thomas Jefferson's, George Mason's and others insistence that the Constitution be amended by the Bill of Rights. It wasn't because they had little concern with liberty guarantees. Quite to the contrary they were concerned about the loss of liberties.

Alexander Hamilton expressed his concerns in Federalist Paper No. 84, "[B]ills of rights . . . are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous." Hamilton asks, "For why declare that things shall not be done [by Congress] which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given [to Congress] by which restrictions may be imposed?" Hamilton's argument was that Congress can only do what the Constitution specifically gives it authority to do. Powers not granted belong to the people and the states. Another way of putting Hamilton's concern: why have an amendment prohibiting Congress from infringing on our right to play hopscotch when the Constitution gives Congress no authority to infringe upon our hopscotch rights in the first place.

Alexander Hamilton added that a Bill of Rights would "contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more [powers] than were granted. . . . [it] would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power." Going back to our hopscotch example, those who would usurp our God-given liberties might enact a law banning our playing hide-and-seek. They'd justify their actions by claiming that nowhere in the Constitution is there a guaranteed right to play hide-and-seek. They'd say, "hopscotch yes, but hide-and-seek, no."

To mollify Alexander Hamilton's fears about how a Bill of Rights might be used as a pretext to infringe on human rights, the Framers added the Ninth Amendment. The Ninth Amendment reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Boiled down to its basics, the Ninth Amendment says it's impossible to list all of our God-given or natural rights. Just because a right is not listed doesn't mean it can be infringed upon or disparaged by the U.S. Congress. Applying the Ninth Amendment to our example: just because playing hopscotch is listed and hide-and-seek is not doesn't mean that we don't have a right to play hide-and-seek.

How do courts see the Ninth Amendment today? It's more than a safe bet to say that courts, as well as lawyers, treat the Ninth Amendment with the deepest of contempt. In fact, I believe, that if any appellant's lawyer argued Ninth Amendment protections on behalf of his client, he would be thrown out of court if not disbarred. That's what the Ninth Amendment has come to mean today. I believe we all have a right to privacy, but how do you think a Ninth Amendment argument claiming privacy rights would fly with information gathering agencies like the Internal Revenue Service? Try to assert your rights to privacy in dealing with the IRS and other government agencies and I'll send you cigarettes and candy while you're in jail.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help!
cluponka [151]
The correct answer is B.
Hope it helps!!!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select ALL the correct answers.
neonofarm [45]

The three statements that accurately describe the beliefs of the members of the American Indian Movement in the 1970s are options B., D., and E. They are:

  • New laws are needed to protect the rights of American Indians.
  • The federal government should honor rights it had already given American Indians.
  • The United States had betrayed its own democratic values through its treatment of American Indians.

<h3>What is the American Indian Movement in?</h3>

The American Indian Movement (AIM) is a Native American homebased movement founded in July 1968 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, initially centered in urban areas to address systemic issues of poverty, discrimination, and police brutality against Native Americans.

Therefore, the correct answers are options B., D., and E.

learn more about American Indian Movement: brainly.com/question/863447

#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Who gave D.W. Griffith his first job in cinema?
stich3 [128]
D.W Griffith first job in cinema was given by Edwin S. Potter! Hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
What is inflation mean in history?
gregori [183]

an increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money.

Explanation:

inflation in history happens when there is a decline of purchase, this effects the money circulation and can cause surplus of items that arent being bought. this is the opposite of a deflation. which caused the stock market to crash and the immediate cause of the great depression.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a medium?
    7·2 answers
  • After President Eisenhower withdrew his offer to fund the Aswan Dam, what did Egyptian President Nasser do?
    8·1 answer
  • What city was a capital of song China ?
    11·1 answer
  • What caused hundred years war
    15·1 answer
  • Can i please get help with this?!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Summarize the main differences between the art of DaVinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael.
    14·1 answer
  • Period A is known as what? post history prehistory history
    13·2 answers
  • What is one reason that Thomas Paine thinks the colonies stand a good chance against the British ?
    9·1 answer
  • Which conqueror came to Chile?<br><br> Pizzaro<br> Magellan<br> de Gama<br> Columbus
    10·2 answers
  • Activity
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!