1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
2 years ago
11

Based on the statement, why did Senator Norris oppose American involvement in World War 1

History
1 answer:
kakasveta [241]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Because American involvement would have no impact on the outcome of the war. Because both Great Britain and Germany had violated international law

You might be interested in
Who painted the sistine chapel?
DaniilM [7]
<span>Michelangelo did this wonderful painting </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The United States refused to join _____ following World War I. the Warsaw Pact the Triple Entente the League of Nations the Axis
Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:

the League of Nations

Explanation:

After the World War I ended, the League of Nations was formed. Lot of nations became members of it, but not the United States. The United States felt that joining the League of Nations was not in its best interest, especially considering the fact that they wanted to further expand in the Pacific, nor were they willing to give up on the territories they recently gained and controlled. This changed after the World War II though, when the League of Nations became the United Nations, and the United States had different interests and were one of the first nations to join in.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one reason historians might believe di Coppo di stefani Buonaiuti’s account of the Black Death?
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

One reason why this is believable is because di Coppo Di Stefano Buonaiuti was in Florence at the time when the Black Death hit Florence in 1338. One reason why this passage isn't believable is because he was only two when it happened so might not remember it all.

7 0
3 years ago
Why were the tactics of using seach and destroy, napalm, and agent orange conter to the united states' goal winning the "hearts
slega [8]
They countered it because they ruined the land in every way possible which made it hard even for their allies from South Vietnam to support them. Napalm just burnt down forests and habituated areas and harmed a lot of civilians directly, while things such as agent orange destroyed the environment and poisoned the ground, the waters, the food, and basically anything else. It caused much more harm to the people than it did to help them.
8 0
2 years ago
Addme pls send me £ so i know your from here ​
Leto [7]

Answer:

hey

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the cause and consequences of imperialism in WW1?<br>​
    7·1 answer
  • He absorption of certain provisions of the bill of rights into the fourteenth amendment so that these rights are protected from
    9·1 answer
  • One of the major steps in Napoleon climb to power
    13·2 answers
  • 1. What is the most difficult part of cotton<br> production?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the domestication and cultivation of grains and legumes lead to the building of cities and political systems?
    15·1 answer
  • What are the benefits of using ideas from ancient civilization in our government
    14·1 answer
  • What do you think was the greatest accomplishment of the Neolithic<br> Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • Research election results in Georgia for the past two elections. Write one paragraph
    7·1 answer
  • What tipped the balance of power during the French and Indian War?
    8·1 answer
  • 5. Which phrase best describes the branches of government under the Articles of
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!