Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: "cracking" (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) and "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).[3] The third tactic, shown in the top-left diagram in the diagrams to the right, is that of homogenization of all districts.
The purpose is to help or hinder a particular demographic, such as a political, ethnic, racial, linguistic, religious, or class group, such as in U.S. federal voting district boundaries that produce a majority of constituents representative of African-American or other racial minorities, known as "majority-minority districts"
The problem is that it causes increased incumbent advantage and campaign costs
, less descriptive representation
, or using prisoners as voter count.
Not all business practices are ethical, they also are unfair with their exchanges between smaller and larger economies.
You need to add a picture in order for others to understand what you are asking.
Answer:
(A) Catering to the interests of national party officials sometimes conflicts with serving the interests of a provincial or state official’s local constituencies.
Explanation:
The best assumption made by the argument is that the interest of the national party sometimes conflicts with the interest of the local citizens thus making the provincial officials or state officials fail in serving the interest of their local constituencies.
Option B and C is incorrect because the argument made does not suggest that elections are won only on the basis of serving national party interest and neither does the argument assert that the interest of local constituencies are well served only by elected officials who do not cater to the interest of national party officials.
Option D is also incorrect because not only does the argument not mention that elected officials should only cater for the interest of the constituency, elected officials also have a responsibility to the party on whose platform the won elections.
Option E is wrong, it is out of the focus of the argument.
Answer:
A
Explanation: After consulting the ancient scrolls and using the index i found the answer.