Animals are wrongly forced into mistreatment, animal rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, hunting, and experimentation. All animals should have the right to roam freely without being pursued and killed. The damage that hunting inflicts on animals are terrible-the noise, fear, and the constant chase.
The answer is D..
A, B and C are negative impacts.
The explicit statement in paragraph 4 that leaves no implicit suggestions is;
- Biologists backed up these ideas with sketches and models based on known animals.
An explicit statement is one that leaves nothing to the imagination. It states facts that are not open to interpretation.
The stated facts are clearly understood. In the third option, the author states a fact that is easily understood and that is not prone to interpretations.
It is just a clear fact that the Biologists backed up their ideas with sketches and models.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/863984
Look at how the character change or grow
Hope this helps :D
The things that could be observed from a painting are that it is a <u>portrait of a man</u>, it shows<u> visible brush strokes</u>, and<u> displays bold colors</u>.
Even though there was no attached painting, we would be able to see these things within the painting. You can see what is contained in the painting, how it was painted, and what colors the painting is. However, you can not see when a painting was created or know that it is part of a large collection by simply looking at the painting.
