Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.
Answer:
A criticism of the current presidential primary election schedule is that it gives undue weight to the few states with early primaries, as those states often build momentum for leading candidates and rule out trailing candidates long before the rest of the country has even had a chance to weigh in, leaving the last
Answer: I believe A is the answer, but it could be B
Explanation: The XYZ affair raised anti-French sentiment which caused the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts. This was one of the most unpopular pieces of legislation ever passed by Congress. It cost John Adams re-election and allowed Thomas Jefferson to paint him as a monarch.
Answer:
The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire.
Explanation:
Answer:
Stated that people should be able to enjoy liberty.
Explanation:
The Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of Man are both documents that state rights of people, while both addresses government issues the main goal of these declarations are the right to enjoy liberty and not being controlled or explored by tyrannical and abusive governs and political representatives.
