<span>Ross arrives and announces that Macbeth is to be the new Thane of Cawdor, thus confirming the first prophecy of the Witches. Banquo and Macbeth are struck dumb for the second time, but now Shakespeare contrasts their responses. Banquo is aware of the possibility that the prophecies may have been the work of supernatural dark forces, as exemplified in his lines "What? Can the Devil speak true?" (108) and "oftentimes, to win us to our harm, / The instruments of Darkness tell us truths . . . — (only) to betray us" (123-125). Macbeth is more ambiguous. His speech is full of what will now become his trademark — questioning, doubting, weighing up, and seeking to justify: "This supernatural soliciting / Cannot be ill; cannot be good" (130-131).</span>
I found the analysis online but I want to remind you to rewrite it properly. If you do not want to be caught, check what the writers from Prime Writing can do for you.
In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr., he writes to defend himself against the clergymen’s accusations in which he explains his motive on his civil rights demonstrations and strives to justify the desperate needs for nonviolent action in the Civil Rights Movement. His primary audience throughout the letter was to the religious leaders as he was responding to an open letter for criticism, whereas the secondary audiences are white moderates and the religious population. Dr King’s letter addresses that the white attitudes towards African Americans and the Civil Rights Movements in the 1960s were hostile as they were unable to accept the movement, especially in the South. Throughout the letter, he uses various literary and rhetorical devices to justify his actions and show why they aren't illegal.
Answer:
Sounds like someone is bored, so the tone is boredom?
I need more information about this
