The statement that is not true is: A healthy ecosystem can support an unlimited number of life forms.
Any ecosystem has its limits. No matter is a healthy, in perfect shape, and very large ecosystem, there's always a limit as to how much life forms can the ecosystem support. If the number of life forms surpasses the ability of the ecosystem to support them, than the ecosystem will crash, be destroyed, and experience a lot of changes, with the death of lot of life forms involved in the process as well.
There isn't such thing as an ecosystem that has the ability to support an infinite number of life forms, there's only ecosystems that are able to support limited number of life forms.
Answer:
To calculate the RNI, demographers subtract the death rate (number of deaths per 1,000 people/year) from the birth rate (number of birth per 1,000 people/year) and convert the answer to a percentage.
Equation for Rate of Natural Increase (RNI):
(BirthRate/1,000) – (DeathRate/1000) = (BR-DR)/1000 = RNI %
Hope it helps!
Answer:
It could take several thousands of years.
Explanation:
To be specific, the exact number of stars in the galaxy is unknown, it's estimated to have around 100 to 400 billion stars.
But for the sake of this test, let's take as valid a recent study of the European space agency, that believes that we have 100 billion stars orbiting our galaxy.
If you could count 1 every second it would mean you'll need at least 100 billion seconds to do it. How many days is that?
We have:
100 billion seconds = 1.666 billion minutes
1.666 billion minutes = 27.777 million hours
27.777 million hours = 1,157 million days = 3,170 years.
You would need at least, 3170 years of spare time, considering that you will do no other thing than counting stars for the next 3 millennia.
It is D it does not have a characteristic of sovereign
Answer:
a transformation that produces an image that is the same shape as the original but a different size
Explanation:
