Answer:
the answer is A C E on eged
Explanation:
i took the test
Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
In the 17th century, the New Dutch Republic was the most prosperous state in Europe, and this led to the Dutch Golden Age of Painting, that was mainly financed by the wealthy tradesmen and financiers.
Some of the painters of the era were: Johannes Vermeer, Frans Post, Aelbert Cuyp, Jan den Uyl, and Abraham Bloemaert.
The paintings span several topics, from grand maritime landscapes depicting the maritime Dutch Republic, to still lifes depiciting fruits, household items, tables and chairs.
it is safe to say that James Madison was the "father" of the Constitution and John Marshall was the "father" of the Supreme Court.
