Answer:
1. Noun clause acts as subject.
2. Indirect object.
3. Direct Object.
4. Appositive.
5. Object of preposition.
Explanation:
Noun Clause is word which plays role of a noun in a sentence.
Indirect Object explains about the whom the action ahs been performed.
Direct object is recipient of an action who performs the verb himself.
Appositive is a phrase which help to provide details about noun. It explain the noun.
Predicate noun contains a verb and it tells about noun.
Answer:
The first choice.
Explanation:
When using indirect characterization, an author does not state direct facts about a person's character, but rather describes the personality through verbal actions and gestures.
Selma keeping her eyes glue to the ground tells us that she is somewhat timid. Knowing that she avoids eye contact completely, even when someone talks to her, lets us know that Selma is shy to an extreme and perhaps antisocial.
Answer:
I would say the correct answer is B. To give the English king a graceful way out of what could be an awkward situation.
Explanation:
The emperor's letter is a perfect example of a well-balanced political message. <u>He clearly states his political position while still paying due respect to his counterpart.</u> Translated to modern, everyday English, this passage would mean: "Your request is unreasonable and goes against all principles and rules of my great empire; still, I will be gracious enough to assume that you meant no offence." This way, <u>the emperor turns down a request without making an enemy</u>.
True, the emperor refuses King George's request to intensify trade connections between the two countries. But he doesn't go so far as to warn the English king of anything. His tone remains polite throughout the letter. Therefore, A) isn't correct.
On the other hand, C) isn't correct because Qian Long presents his current political stance and the politics of his empire as definite and immutable. Therefore, there is no room for change - not now, not ever.
Finally, D) isn't correct because the emperor knows very well that an ambassador always speaks on behalf of his sovereign. Therefore, it is absolutely impossible that a political envoy would take liberty to speak on his own terms.
Answer:
- Bus
- Questions
- Phone
- Office
- Taxi
- Work
Hope this is what you are looking for :)
Please mark as Brainliest
People being anti firearms due to their lack of understanding and irrational fear of the weapons and tools due to lack of education
