Answer:
In this bizarre new world we live in, expect the unexpected. The normal chronology of life has been altered. After the epidemic, the Organization had to instill an embargo on unnecessary travel. It was for our own good. Their catchy slogans filled with alliterations and analogies to make us remember .By "staying inside at all costs" we were keeping each other alive. Local scientists believed that strange antibodies mixed with the chemicals made these zombie-like creatures. Some of us were lucky enough to not carry them. The Organization believed it was deign to talk to anyone outside our walls, that they could be infected too. At the time, everyone was an exponent of their ideas because we all wanted to survive. But Now? I am ready to boycott. As I step outside for the fist time in years, covered in green camouflage and overly enthusiastic, I am ready to reunite with the world.
hope this helps more than the former
In my opinion, I think animals shouldnt be kept in zoos because zoos dont provide good natural habitats and can put unnecessary stress on the animals. For example, zoos dont have the right facilities for hibernation animals and big animals like elephants. Zoos can be too small and limited for the elephants. Because their habitat isnt big enough to migrate, this can change their behavior and can lead to aggression. Also, zoos to people are for entertainment so animals are captured and is put into poor habitats with poor conditions and separated from other animals of their own.
I would say either D or B but it depends on whether the Romantic ideals are personal to the character or if they’re a theme throughout the story :)
According to the excerpt from "monstrous people at the end of the earth ,"how did monsters of the 16th century differ from the ones known during ancient times?
Criminals sksksksksdnshshs
