Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.
I dont know I have been stuck on this one too
Answer:
central government should be "rigorously frugal and simple." As president he reduced the size and scope of the federal government by ending internal taxes, reducing the size of the army and navy, and paying off the government's debt. Limiting the federal government flowed from his strict interpretation of the Constitution.
Answer:
a.
Spencer and Social Darwinists represent the evolutionary approach to social change.
Explanation:
As in nature, the stronger countries and nations prevail and dominate the weaker, which are inferior and not so smart and able as the strong ones, Social Darwinists argue.
<h2>
Answer: C) initially was focused in Britain, where machinery was invented and the use of steam to power engines emerged</h2>
Explanation:
The Industrial Revolution was a great change that occurred in the european society when it stop basing its economy on agriculture and began to depend on the industry. It should be noted that this social movement was born in England and then spread to the rest of Europe.
Why in England and not somewhere else?
Because England had given all the conditions, since this country had abundant labor men, deposits of coal, as well as colonies overseas, of which supplies of raw material was always enough. In addition, Englad had a large network of waterways that facilitated the transport of goods through the interior of its territory.
This means England had available capital to invest in such a great change as the Industrial Revolution was.
