1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ahrayia [7]
3 years ago
11

Recently, due to Coronavirus, the state of California has ordered the closure of “non-essential” businesses. These closures incl

uded places of worship like churches and have drawn criticism from the church community. They argue that the forced closure of churches is unconstitutional. What do you think? Is the closure of indoor, in-person, church services unconstitutional? Explain.
History
2 answers:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It is not unconstitutional

Explanation:

First of all, the constitution gives you freedom to practice religion, and I'm pretty sure you don't need to go to church to practice religion. Also, the freedom of religion has limits, the same way freedom of speech has limits. There are so many aspects to religion besides going to church. You can pray, read holy text, and join virtual services. Also, WE ARE IN A PANDEMIC!! It is a danger to yourself and others to be out and about during these times. The need to go to church is not the most necessary part of a religion. The ten commandments in Christianity (I'm getting evidence from Christianity because that is the community that is complaining the most) say nothing about having to go to church on Sundays because God knows not everybody has the privilege to go to Church every Sunday. So in summary, no, it is not unconstitutional to prevent indoor, in-person church services.

Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I think that closing churches is a violation of their constitutional rights, they can worship where they please.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did the Declaration of Independence list as a reason the colonies
Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

The colonists were taxed unfairly, threatening their property rights

Explanation:

they were aggrevated

4 0
3 years ago
What event started "Bleeding Kansas"?
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

The event that started "Bleeding Kansas" was the passing of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.

Explanation:

At the heart of the conflict between pro and anti slavery sides was the question of whether Kansas, until then a single Territory, would enter the Union as a "free" state or, on the contrary, as a slave state. In this sense, Bleeding Kansas was a proxy dispute between Northerners and Southerners around the issue of slavery on the territory of the United States.  

The United States Congress had long struggled to maintain a delicate balance between slavers and abolitionists. The events that would go down in history as Bleeding Kansas were triggered in 1854 by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, canceling the Missouri Compromise (which had until then guaranteed a balance between supporters and opponents of the slavery) and proclaiming that the status of the new state of Kansas would be determined by popular sovereignty.

This decision provoked the massive arrival on Kansas of activists of both sides who clashed violently, in the guerrilla mode, for the control of it. On November 21, 1855 the Wakarusa War began when an anti-slavery was killed by a pro-slave. On May 21, 1856, a group of Border Ruffians sacked Lawrence, a small town with anti-slavery theses. The next day, in the Senate, Preston Brooks, a Democrat from South Carolina, knocked out Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts senator and supporter of abolition. On the night of May 24, 1856, John Brown, who arrived in Kansas in October 1855 to fight slavery, slaughtered at Pottawatomie Creek a group of alleged slavers. On June 2, Brown captured about 30 slavery supporters at the Battle of Black Jack. In August 1856, thousands of slavery supporters, organized as armies, invaded Kansas. John Brown and his followers fought a part of it at the Battle of Osawatomie. Hostilities continued for two months until Brown and his followers left Kansas. A total of 56 people were killed in the Bleeding Kansas events.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the four classes of southern society?
White raven [17]

Four main groups. Planters, yeomen, farmers, poor whites, slaves & free African Americans 1/3 of southern families had slaves fewer owned plantations.

4 0
3 years ago
He is one of three Georgians to sign the Declaration of Independence, wrote the original draft of Georgia's first constitution,
Georgia [21]
<span> Button Gwinnett is the answer</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Stamp Act?
zvonat [6]

Answer:

Instead of levying a duty on trade goods, the Stamp Act imposed a direct tax on the colonists. Specifically, the act required that, starting in the fall of 1765, legal documents and printed materials must bear a tax stamp provided by commissioned distributors who would collect the tax in exchange for the stamp.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT included in the Deleration of Independence?
    11·2 answers
  • How did expansion pave the way for world war 11
    13·1 answer
  • Who conquered the Mayans?<br> Olmecs<br> Toltecs<br> Aztecs<br> Spanish<br> PLEASE ANSWER
    15·2 answers
  • Did william blackstone mantained that the government cannot blocK a citizens rights on life,peorty, and liberty
    11·2 answers
  • What happened to the Spanish after they lost their gold?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!
    14·2 answers
  • Which year did each party get the most electoral college<br> delegates? Plsss hurry
    7·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the CW?
    5·1 answer
  • What would have happened to Africa if it hadn't been colonized?
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence from "Island of Hope, Island of Tears" is written using a cause-and-effect text structure?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!