1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrrafil [7]
4 years ago
13

What is the purpose of a peer review? A-to teach debating skills B-to help writers lesrn their weaknesses C-to learn listening s

kills or D-to help writers revise their drafts
English
2 answers:
rusak2 [61]4 years ago
6 0

Answer: To help writers learn their weaknesses

Explanation: Peer review is a method of correction/evaluation in which a work is evaluated by a person or a group of people with the same or similar competences as the performer of the work. Peer review is important at any levels of education because it helps both, the one correcting and the one being corrected. Both learn from their weaknesses.

Feliz [49]4 years ago
5 0
B to help writers to learn there weaknesses
You might be interested in
Which of these lines from William Bradford's Of Plymouth Plantation most clearly show his bias?
Alexxx [7]
<span>There was a proud and very profane young man... But it pleased God before they came half seas over, to smite this young man with a grievous disease, of which he died in a desperate manner, and so was himself the first that was thrown overboard.

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
16. John was unable to work on Sundays because he had a church commitment. This is known as a/an
Tom [10]

its c i think value conflict

6 0
3 years ago
What is the effect of the underlined section in developing the tone of this excerpt from "In a Queen's Domain" by Sarah Morgan B
Hoochie [10]

The effect of the underlined section in developing the tone of this excerpt from "In a Queen's Domain" by Sarah Morgan Bryan Piatt is it helps to change the tone of the poem from calm and carefree to sinister and menacing.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF DONE CORRECTLY : Please write a short essay on The Mystery of Three Quarters by Sophie Hannah (pl
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

<em>‘The world’s most beloved detective, Hercule Poirot – the legendary star of Agatha Christie’s Murder on the Orient Express and most recently The Monogram Murders and Closed Casket—returns in a stylish, diabolically clever mystery set in 1930’s London.’</em>

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

Who hasn’t heard of Hercules Poirot? Who hasn’t read a book by Agatha Christie? Not too many I would think. Agatha Christie is a household name due to her popularity as a writer and particularly a writer of crime fiction. Her characters are well known to all, with the fabulous Hercules Poirot a favourite of many. With his rather distinctive demeanor and quirky eccentricities, Hercules Poirot was brought to the screen by the wonderful actor David Suchet from 1989 to 2013, making him a familiar face in our living rooms. In 2014, crime-fiction writer Sophie Hannah picked up the baton and re-introduced us to Poirot with her novel The Monogram Murders, followed in 2016 by Closed Casket, both receiving much praise across the board. Taking up the pen of a phenomenally successful writer is always going to be a difficult job with criticisms bound to be cast on the writing. Is this a true Poirot mystery? Can Sophie Hannah fulfill the expectations of the true blue Christie fan? Well I guess that’s up to you, the reader, to decide. It might just be the perfect introduction, for those who may not wish to pick up a classic, to this idiosyncratic of characters.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

The Sunday Telegraph says ‘What Sophie and Agatha have in common is a rare talent for fiendish unpredictability. They make you see how the impossible might be possible after all’.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

In The Mystery of Three Quarters, Poirot is unexpectedly verbally assaulted on his doorstep by a woman, Sylvia Rule. She has received a letter that is signed by Hercules Poirot and in this letter she has been accused of murder!! Barnabas Pandy, a man of considerable wealth and a man she had never heard of had died. Now the cause of his death was under suspicion and apparently Poirot had written and signed this letter. Poirot, astonished, rightfully denies any knowledge of this letter or of Barnabas Pandy for that matter, but Sylvia Rule will hear none of this and is infuriated by this allegation.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

In the following days, Poirot receives calls from three further individuals all with the same letter and all accusing Poirot of false recriminations against their good names. All claim their innocence in this matter of murder and all are justifiably angered.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

It is now up to Poirot to get to the bottom of this mystery and discover the truth behind the death of Barnabas Pandy. Was he murdered or is this a personal vendetta and why?

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

Hercules Poirot sets off to discover the truth with the assistance of his friend and confidante, Inspector Edward Catchpool from Scotland Yard. Together they attempt to solve the case of the unidentified scribe and, in typical Christie style, we are introduced to a superb cast of characters.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

It is quite easy to imagine the scenes as Poirot sweeps in and out, like an actor walking on and off the stage. It is a performance that is thoroughly enjoyable as each character has a unique and distinguishable persona, providing the ingredients for a wonderful and ‘diabolically clever’ mystery.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

The Mystery of Three Quarters is a very different read to the current crop of crime novels on the shelves. There is no extreme violence, there is scant blood and there is no great chase across a continent. It is an old-fashioned, cosy mystery, making it a the perfect book to snuggle down by the fire this Winter under a blanket with a steaming mug of hot chocolate (and, if you have one….your dog by your feet!).

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

<h2>HOPE I HELPED <3</h2>

8 0
3 years ago
Which sentence contains a misplaced modifier?
kkurt [141]

The correct answer is D. Yesterday, my dad walked the dog in his suit and tie

Explanation:

In grammar, a modifier is a word or set of words that describe the way some object, person, animal or idea is, that is usually placed before the noun or shortly after it. A misplaced modifier occurs when an adjective or phrase that modifies or describes a noun (modifier) is separated from the noun it modifies, which creates a confuse and strange meaning in the sentence as the modifier can be incorrectly associate to a different noun to the one that it actually modifies. This is a common grammar mistake that consists of the modifier being misplaced or in the wrong place in the sentence.

Considering the previous ideas, the sentence that contains a misplaced modifier is "Yesterday, my dad walked the dog in his suit and tie" as the modifier "in his suit and tie" that describes "my dad" has been separated from the noun it describes and placed at the end of the sentence which creates a confusing meaning as it seems the dog is the one wearing a suit and a tie. Thus, as in this sentence, the modifier is not in the correct place there is a misplaced modifier.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/4386450#readmore

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hat is the primary tone of the narrator throughout the story
    8·1 answer
  • PART A: Which statement identifies the central idea of the text? (The text is called Stop the Atlantic Express)
    10·1 answer
  • Who eventually kills tybalt
    11·2 answers
  • In "the perils of indifference," what evidence does wiesel give that the united states has been successful in ending human suffe
    12·2 answers
  • Person who can afford a monthly payment of
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Make the needed corrections in sentence structure: Because we were late again.
    9·1 answer
  • By Three, all children
    15·1 answer
  • Which example reflects how you would best synthesize information as you read?
    7·2 answers
  • 30 POINTS<br> write a paragraph explaining what a frame story is
    12·2 answers
  • Which rhyme scheme, if any, is used in the second stanza of this poem?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!