I think the answer is b. The church encourages new learnings.
For 2A, woman had to help in the factories, and do some of the mens jobs because the men were all at war. They had to step up.
This is certainly a sensible topic and I'm afraid there's no easy answer as it's very dependant on context.
The criteria for rejecting or accepting certain immigrants will vary depending on the cultural and political relationship between the country where each immigrant comes from and the country they intend to relocate to.
Every nation should aspire to generate conditions of tolerance in which ethnic or racial differences don't represent a threat to the safety of their communities. To achieve this, it would require governments a sustained effort to educate its people in favor of diversity and apply policies that encourage freedom and protect civil liberties. <u>However, </u>t<u>his is a long and arduous process that history has shown sometimes may take several centuries</u>.
In many cases, the tensions between different ethnicities and cultural backgrounds are so high at the present time, that there's no other way to ensure safety than limiting specific types of immigration in certain regions. That is why to me, it is legitimate for a country to take nationality, race and religion into account when deciding who they let in, as long as the government keeps moving towards tolerance in the long-run.
Hope this helps!
Occurred in 1929 your welckme
Credit Card issuer such as HSBC will always been a target for fraud whether it through digital hacking or identity theft.
In order to fully protect your account from such occurences, HSBC pointed out that you need to act as fast as you can whenever you feel that your credit card is missing or mis-used. On top of that, HSBC also deployed SAS Fraud Management to give Global protection for its holders.
