Answer:
A very long time ago, I'd say 1400's-1500's or even longer before that.
Answer:
C.Experienced and skill in war
Explanation:
Answer:
Think about slavery. The average African-American will have very low morale if he is forced to work. Low morale means their work ethic will slip, and sub-par work ethic leads to sub-par product. You'll actually be saving money if you free your slaves. Rather than paying tens of thousands of dollars to buy them and then paying for all of their expenses beyond that, you'll just have to pay them monthly or weekly wages. Abolition is both cost effective and stimulating to the economy.
Explanation:
Large concentrations of individuals were more expensive to care for, especially medically. Most slave owners were primarily concerned about the so-called "wage bubble" that would burst and leave all slave owners destitute, when in reality slave owners who freed their slaves and still had some working for them as freemen flourished.
No, it was not. The main reason the U.S. joined the war was to stop the spread of communism, however, they did not achieve that because the Communist North won. Furthermore, it caused tension within the country, and our beloved nationalism was not there. It caused outrage and many protests. The people of the U.S. became tired of the loss of people and many began to see our government as weak.<span />
One way in which Suleiman the Magnificent and Peter the Great are similar is that they both (1) modernized their military. However, both leaders are also associated with reformation. Peter the Great led many military campaigns in Northern Europe and Suleiman the Magnificent vastly extended the Ottoman Empire.
