1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
drek231 [11]
3 years ago
13

What lessons can be learned from the first contact between the English and the Pequot?

History
1 answer:
Mrrafil [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In this lesson, you'll learn how the Pequot Indians lived before the arrival of the Europeans and what happened when the European colonists settled in America.

Explanation:

What happened when the Pequot Indians met the European colonists? How did the Pequot live before the settlers arrived, and how did the presence of the colonists change the lives of the Pequot? In this lesson, you'll explore answers to these three important questions.

The Pequot Indians lived in the region that became Connecticut. They were part of the Algonquian-speaking Indians of southern New England, a culturally and linguistically similar but not united people, which included the Narragansett, Mohegan, and Wampanoag Indians. Together, the Algonquian Indians numbered over 125,000 people, but the Pequot lived in bands of several hundred people.

The Pequot lived in what is now Connecticut.

The Pequot lived very differently than the English settlers who arrived during the early 17th century. One major difference was that, unlike the English who lived year-round in permanent homes, the Pequot lived in villages some of the year and then migrated to hunting and gathering grounds for the rest of the year. This mobility meant the Pequot did not have a concept of private property; they did not own land or possess many material goods. This differed significantly from the colonists who came to America largely because they wanted to own more land than they could in England. The Pequot also did not have or use money the same way as the colonists. Instead of money, the Pequot and other Algonquians prized wampum, highly coveted strings of beads made from seashells. Wampum symbolized status and spiritual power and played an important role in diplomacy between Indian groups.

The Pequot also viewed work and the division of labor differently than the English settlers. While the settlers worked tirelessly to accumulate personal property and goods, and to protect that property from each other with fences and locks, the Pequot worked enough to survive, but enjoyed more leisure time than the colonists. Moreover, while the English usually viewed the family as the unit they were responsible for feeding and housing, the Pequot thought more in terms of the whole band. Members of each band made sure everyone had sufficient food and shelter and individuals assisted those in need. Indeed, Pequot rulers, called sachems, maintained their positions through generosity. While European leaders often demonstrated and maintained power through accumulating riches, Pequot sachems won respect by giving gifts.

When it came to work, Pequot men and women had clear roles. Women cared for the children, built the wigwams (homes), prepared the food, and tended the farms. The Pequot had a very effective and efficient method of agriculture. They primarily grew corn, beans and squash, but they did not plant these in separate fields, as did the English settlers. Instead, they grew all three plants together in a mutually beneficial manner: the corn stalks provided support for the bean vines, the low-growing squash deterred weeds and kept the soil moist, and the beans added nutrients to the soil. The men were responsible for hunting, fishing, and making weapons and tools. The Pequot division of labor caused serious misunderstandings with the colonists, who saw farming as the man's domain. This difference contributed to the colonists' perception of the Indians as inferior barbarians.

The Pequot grew corn, beans, and squash together.

The Pequot had a very effective strategy for hunting: fire. The Pequot periodically and deliberately burned the forests, which achieved several desirable outcomes. First, frequent and controlled burns kept the forests relatively open, which helped the men track and kill animals. Second, fires kept the forests healthy by returning nutrients to the soil and allowing for new growth by clearing the underbrush. The Pequot agriculture and hunting strategies demonstrated how they creatively exploited their environment. The arrival of English colonists, however, would irreversibly alter the lives and traditions of all Indians, including the Pequot.

You might be interested in
I need help on history about Bill of Rights <br><br> I will give brainlist<br><br> No links
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

1.prohibits any law limiting freedom with respect to religion, expression, peaceful assembly, or the right of citizens to petition the government.

Description:this protects freedom of speech and right to worship religion or not. Right to gather peacefully, and right to petition the government

2.The right to keep and bear arms.

description: to allow freedom of being safe like having military around and cops.

3.No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

description: A soldier can't enter ur home and do whatever they want unless the homeowner allows it like during war,or not during war.

4.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures

If a cop is sus that u did something and what they find relates to the crime is prohibited, they have to stop u only if they saw u commit a crime.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the dominant religion in the region?
AveGali [126]
The dominant religion is the religion that has the most people following, in a certain region
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What event stressed the dependence on God and was known as a
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

1

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The U.S. government's actions in the late nineteenth century particularly targeted immigrants from?
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Traditionally, Eurocentric historians have focused on the works of European philosophers instead of African philosophers because
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

Biasedness

Explanation:

To be Eurocentric historians implies that such historians favor historical perspectives and evidence that support the superiority, supremacy, and domination of European thoughts, values, and cultures over non-Europeans histories. This position is often influenced by Bias, Prejudice, or Partiality.

Hence, Traditionally, Eurocentric historians have focused on the works of European philosophers instead of African philosophers because of their BIASEDNESS

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was most likely the reason that the Confederate army burned Richmond
    7·1 answer
  • During industrialization which led to an explosion of new economic theories
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the US begin to expand in the early 1800
    9·1 answer
  • What perception do people around the world have of South Africa? Why do you think they have that perception?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the changes in land ownership and labor change society after the Civil War
    12·1 answer
  • True or false
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think factory owners use child labour in their factories​
    5·1 answer
  • How did the railroads boost Washington’s economy?
    8·1 answer
  • How did Indian boarding schools impact Washington State history?
    11·1 answer
  • When Germany reunified why did European countries feared it.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!