The modifier "<em>As the next manager of Pizza Perfection</em>" is a dangling modifier.
A dangling modifier is a grammatical construct that is ambiguous, for it is not clearly and logically conected to the word it is intended to modify. Therefore, it can be confused as a modifier of a word other than the one intended, or of no word at all. In the case at hand, the phrase seems to be modifying the subject, "you", when, in reality, it is refering to the speaker.
A good correction would be, for example:
"You said you wanted thicker crusts and cheesier pizzas. <em>As </em><em>I am</em><em> the next manager of Pizza Perfection</em>, you will get pizza as near to perfect as we can make it."
Journalist can build credibility after the information being plagiarized or fabricated by issuing the retraction at first, and then continue to write strong articles by citing sources in the future.
Answer : Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Whenever there is a case of fabricated information or plagiarised content developed over the media platform, Journalist suffer defamation but they can build credibility all over again.
As soon as such case crept in, first measure should be taken to issue a retraction from the journalist side or the publication side. Then the journalist should not be demotivated but continue to write more evidently strong articles with citing the sources in the future.
Journalist should ensure validity of any story that they have reported. Journalist should never harm the reputation of the organization they represent.
It adds more 'umph' to your text. It makes it more entertaining and paints a picture in their minds. As if they can 'hear' the sounds they are reading. :)