How are the animals chosen in a sound of thunder?

English

1 answer:

SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Eckels does not understand why they have to be so careful, so Travis gives a lengthy explanation about how one animal being killed could quite possibly cause the death of billions of future organisms. Eckels then asks how the safari company decides which animal they are going to hunt in the first place if any animal death is such a big deal. Lesperance explains that he goes back and tracks an animal that is about to die from natural causes. By doing this, he knows that no animal is depending on it for food, and he knows that it will not mate again. Because the animal is going to die within minutes anyway, its death from hunting will not affect the time stream.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Always use the _______ tense to indicate a connection between actions that happened in the past.

Eddi Din [679]

<span>It is either past perfect tense or pat progressive.
Example:
past perfect--- I had cooked when they brought the food.
past progressive---I was cooking when they brought the food.
Had cooked is past perfect, and was cooking is past progressive. Had cooked indicates cooking was finished, and wascooking indicates it was going on or in progress when something else happened (in the simple past).</span>

3 0

2 years ago

What is the authors purpose in both patrick Henry’s speech and Thomas paines common sense?

Makovka662 [10]

The author's purpose in both Patrick Henry’s speech and Thomas Paine's common sense is discussed below.

<h3>What distinguishes Patrick Henry from Thomas Paine?</h3>

Thomas Paine employed a sardonic, formal tone, whereas Patrick Henry used a furious, yet emotional tone. But in the end, Patrick Henry's delivery worked better at persuading American colonists to support independence.

The best course of action is to PERSUADE THE COLONISTS TO RESIST the BRITISH RULE.

When the British were in charge of the colonies, these two authors published their writings. The main goal of the writings of these two authors is to persuade the colonists that refusing to rebel against the oppressive British authority serves no useful purpose and that doing so is the only option for them to achieve independence.