Answer:
The act laid the groundwork for modern welfare in the U.S. with its primary focus to provide aid for the elderly, the unemployed, and children
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).
2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.
3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.
4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.
5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).
The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.
Explanation:
ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.
How did the League of Nations respond to genocide prior to 1945?
The League of Nations responded to genocide prior to 1945 in a weak way. The League of Nations failed to politically and militarily challenge this terrible act.
The League of Nations was a forum to resolve disputes among member countries. Through its charter, member nations pledged to act collectively against any country that attacked a member country. However, in reality, it did never had the proper organization and coordination to address important issues such as genocide.
The League of Nations was formed after World War 1 in order to prevent another armed conflict. It was the precursor of the United Nations. United States President Woodrow Wilson was one of the most important supporters of the idea although, in the end, the United States decided no to be part of the League.
He was a Federalist, Democratic-Republican, a National Republican, and then later part of the Whig Party.
Hope this helps.
