All categories

3 years ago

11 points Please answer quick.

Mathematics

1 answer:

ICE Princess25 [194]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

$\boxed{x^4 + x^2 + x}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{x^5 - x^4 + x^3 -x^2 + x - 1}{x - 1}$

$= \frac{(x - 1)(x^4 + x^2 + x)}{x - 1}$

$= x^4 + x^2 + x$

Happy to help :)

You might be interested in

The LATERAL Surface Area for the shape below is:

Anarel [89]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

perimeter of Base=2(l+w)=2(11+10)=2×21=42 cm

lateral area =perimeter of Base×height=42×5=210 cm²

5 0

3 years ago

Help.. hello this is geometry right triangles test thanks

Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

r2 + h2 = t2

Step-by-step explanation:

pythagorean theorem : a2 + b2 = c2

8 0

3 years ago

Please answer this correctly

max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

Yellow model, 20%

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 25 rooms that are vacant, out of 125. This means that 20% of the rooms are vacant. The yellow model displays this correctly because the sections are 1/5 or 20% out of 125.

3 0

4 years ago

Suppose that

denis23 [38]

Answer:

A, B, D, H are the correct statements

Step-by-step explanation:

A) If R1 were symmetric, since we have the relation (2,4), we should have for symmetry the relation (4,2), which is not the case. Therefore R1 is not symmetric and A is True.

B) There are only 2 relations in R3, (2,4) and (4,2). One relation is the symmetric relation of the other, therefore R3 is symmetric and B is True.

C) If R3 were transitive it should satysfy the <em>transitive rule</em>. Since 2 is related with 4 and 4 is related with 2, then for transitivity 2 should be related with itself, which is not true. As a consecuence, R3 is not transitive and C is False.

D) The elements that appear in R2 are 1, 2, 3 and 4. R2 is reflexive because we have all the relations (1,1), (2,2), (3,3) and (4,4) that relate an element with itself. We conclude that D is True.

E) R4 is not symmetric because we have the relation (1,2) but we dont have the symmetric relation (2,1) in R4. Therefore E is False.

F) The element 4 appears in R1 but we dont have the relation (4,4) in R1. This means that R1 in not reflexive, so F is False.

G) Similar to what happened with R2, the elements 1,2,3 and 4 appear in R5 and all the relations (1,1), (2,2), (3,3) and (4,4) are present in R5. As a consecuence, every element is related to itself, which means that R5 IS reflexive, and because of that, G is False.

H) All the realtions in R5 are of the form '(a,a)' for a in {1,2,3,4}. Suppose we have a chain of relations (a,b), and (b,c) in R5, and we want to know if (a,c) is in R5. Necessarily, a = b, and b = c. Then, a and c are equal, which means that the relation (a,c) is the relation (a,a), which is in R5 for any a in {1,2,3,4}. This proves the transitivity of R5 and therefore, H is True.

I) R3 is not reflexive because 2 is an element of the set and the relation (2,2) is not in R3. I is False

8 0

3 years ago

Maria necesita un par de zapatos de tacon para un evento de gala y ya vio tres pares que le gustaron mucho cada uno cuesta $500,

Art [367]

Answer:

Mária debe trabajar mínimo 9 horas si quisiera tener la cantidad para pagar cualquiera de los pares de zapatos.

Step-by-step explanation:

Tenemos que calcular la cantidad de horas que tiene que trabajar María para alcanzar la cantidad de dinero necesaria para comprar alguno de los pares. La cantidad de dinero que Mária gana por trabajar x horas es 50.50*x. La cantidad total de dinero que tiene María está dada por 200+50.50*x (se le suma la cantidad que tiene ahorrada). Luego, basta con que esta cantidad sea mayor o igual al precio de cada par de zapatos.

Para hacerlo de manera más general, considerando unos zapatos que cuestan y, tenemos la siguiente inecuación

$200+50.5x \geq y$