Answer:
The nature of the personal conflict between John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor was exacerbated by the infidelity between John and Abigail. No woman has ever liked sharing her husband with another woman. Men also hated sharing their wives with other men, but they indulge in this evil, all the same.
Their argument of whether to present the illicit affair before the court in order to determine the witchcraft accusations being peddled by Abigail Williams against Elizabeth Proctor further heightened the action of the play.
Explanation:
Arthur Miller's 1953 play, titled "The Crucible," was written to chronicle the events that led to the witchcraft trial. The play's events corresponded to the events that actually occurred in Salem, Massachusetts during 1692. According to Arthur Miller, the main idea behind "The Crucible" was to criticize McCarthyism or the practice of making accusations without sufficient evidence. The play wanted to encourage people to stop jumping to the worst conclusions, especially when they lacked substantial evidence.
I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
Thank god I’m failing thanks for the answer
Answer:
hey what? what are you need to know
