The corecct anwser would be C mongolia. This is known as the 3rd most least densely populated countries in the world. with Greenland in 1st and Falkland Islands as 2nd.
Answer:
A car driving down a hill
Explanation:
The correct answer to this question is a car driving down a ill because the car is bigger (mass) and faster (speed). It has a bigger mass and a faster speed. So A is the correct answer for this question.
Answer: A car driving down a hill
<em><u>Hope this helps.</u></em>
Answer:
B). Miami, Florida, would have warmer temperatures because it is nearer to the equator.
Explanation:
As per the details given in the chart, the readers can infer that 'Miami and Florida would have warmer temperatures as it is close to the equator.' The first option is incorrect as lower altitudes correspond to increase in temperature while the third option is wrong as the higher elevation leads to decrease in air pressure and temperature. The last option is incorrect as places near to equator are relatively hotter than the places far from it as the former receives sun's heat from a direct angle. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
<h3>Peruvian adaptations to their physical environment</h3>
Explanation:
The Peruvians adapted to their natural environment of high altitude mountains like the Andes. The mountains created environmental challenges like low temperature, decreased precipitation, poor thin soil etc.
The Peruvians utilized the mountains in the most sustainable and efficient way both for agriculture as well as irrigation purposes. They followed terrace agriculture along the high mountain regions and built aqueducts to supply water for drinking and irrigation.
The agricultural terraces were constructed in such a way it received a good amount of sunlight even though sunlight was blocked by the surrounding high mountains. The crops were spaced widely to ensure proper sunlight and crop growth.
The irrigation system through aqueducts was constructed to prevent flooding.
Answer:
archaeological
Explanation:
The 4th to 6th centuries CE were a time of natural disasters including plague, earthquakes, and climatic instability, as well as warfare and invasions. Yet archaeological evidence demonstrates that in this period rural village communities in the eastern Mediterranean flourished, with new building, settlement of marginal land, high levels of agricultural production, and wide export of their products. In seeking to explain the vitality of the Eastern Mediterranean countryside in spite of manifold shocks, this article applies Community Resilience Theory, a body of research on the internal socio-economic capacities that have enabled communities in the contemporary world to successfully bounce back from crisis. By examining the archaeological remains of late antique eastern Mediterranean rural communities, we can see beyond the constraints of elite textual accounts to the lives of ordinary people in these flourishing villages. Material remains which attest a high volume and diversity of economic activities, a degree of equitable distribution of income, effective routes of communication, the existence of social capital, and capacity for cooperation and technological innovation reveal how the people of these communities might have acted as historical agents in determining their own fate.
