no. i don’t really think they should.
Law enforcement officers aka the police has the sole purpose to protect and serve a community of people in their jurisdiction. A SWAT team specializes in high-risk situations i.e hostage situations, bomb threats, high profile warrant subjects. They are appropriately decked out in armored vehicles tactical combative gear and are equipped with powerful rifles to execute contracts that regular police officers aren’t equipped for.
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
false
Explanation:
False. Independent Contractors need not to be covered.