I would say a), c) and d) all represent potential ethical issues and becoming aware of the mistake and misquote means that they must be reported immediately ie use full disclosure and for referring a friend for a job interview could be considered conflict of interest.
Answer: David is happy
I am richard
she is beautiful
are you spanish
are you a fortn ite player
brenda and elizabeth are best friends
the cat is on the table
school is clean and green
it is a very nice day
i was 13, i am 14
Explanation:
If you hadn't had so many snacks, you would have more of an appetite.
hope this helped
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
