Answer:
letter b. the compromise over the legislature po Ang sagot
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
Hello!
( Coming from a Hawaiian )
America had first wanted to Annex Hawaii because they played a valuable point in their economy. The Hawaiians were against this because this means that they would have to support the Americans in decisions and they did not want to give the Americans anything.
I hope it helps!
<u>Delegate number 1:</u>
May 27, 1787
Dear Diary,
I am very proud to know that I am participating in the Constitutional Convention. I feel grateful about the fact that my input is appreciated in this event, and that I am able to do my part for my country. I also feel lucky because the states seem likely to ratify the Constitution. This is great news because the Constitution will ensure that the rights of all people are equally valued and respected.
<u>Delegate number 2:</u>
June 10, 1787
Dear Diary,
I have been in the Constitutional Convention for a few days now, and I feel very inspired. Since reading the words of Locke, I have learned to appreciate the values of natural rights, democratic rule and the rule of law. I want to be able to include these ideas in the Constitution because I believe that, by doing so, I will be able to bring an important contribution to my country.
<u>Delegate number 3:</u>
June 28, 1787
Dear Diary,
Being at the Constitutional Convention has been difficult, but also extremely rewarding. An importance challenge that we will have to face is that of determining how to correctly divide the power of the state among all the different branches of government. We will also have to discuss the best ways in which the rights of the people can be protected. I think we will solve this through the implementation of a fair Constitution. I look forward to all these methods that we will implement.
