Answer:
a. only the principal is liable on the contract.
Explanation:
Under agency law, an undisclosed principal refers to a principal's use of an agent for negotiations with a third party who doesn't know/have the identity of the principal. In such situations the agent acts as though he is not functioning as an agent and is solely acting on his own
The United States law according to the Restatement (Third) of Agency 2.06, holds an undisclosed principal liable to a third party who detrimentally makes a change in position, even if the agent lacked authority to cause this change, and resting on the fact that the principal had knowledge of the agent's actions and did not take necessary actions.
The later leader-member exchange (LMX) studies shifted focus from describing in- and out-groups to <u>how LMX relates to </u><u>organizational</u><u> </u><u>effectiveness.</u>
<u></u>
The leader-Member exchange idea first emerged in the Seventies. It specializes in the relationship that develops between managers and individuals in their groups. The idea states that each relationship between managers and subordinates goes through three degrees.
The fundamental concept in the back of the leader-member exchange (LMX) principle is that leaders form groups, an in-group and an out-institution, of followers. In-organization members are given greater duties, greater rewards, and more attention. The chief allows these contributors some range of their roles.
The goal of the LMX idea is to explain the effects of leadership on members, teams, and businesses. In keeping with the principle, leaders shape robust belief, emotional, and respect-primarily based relationships with some individuals of a group, however no longer with others. Interpersonal relationships may be multiplied.
Learn more about the leader-Member exchange here brainly.com/question/15706031
#SPJ1
Bejdjidjekfifjfjfjdjdkkdkddkdkjdjzjsnsj.
the answer is: People with religious objections to serving in the military can still be drafted.
<span> Act of rebellion , unless the laws of England in the 18th Century were considerably more draconian - but saying that, virtually every criminal offence at that time was a capital offence, so things might have been stricter there as well)</span>
