The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
<span>-It struck down the use of strict racial quotas.
-It ruled race could not be factored into admissions.
-It limited diversity and inequality in the workplace.
-It changed the way applications could be written.
I think the correct answer is the first option. </span>Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies by striking down the use of strict racial quotas.
Answer:
gf ff ff f f gff f ff d f f f ff f f f f f f f f f f f f f f ffff f ff ff ff f ff f f ff f ff f f f
Explanation:
Fun fact Hitler was an artist he wasn’t that bad honestly this boy was fresh with it but then they rejected him and then he became a killer cosas sad
The shrinking of the economy lowered the profit after selling goods and it wouldn't make sense not to lay off workers
<span>The history of English Immigration to America began in the 1600's when England established colonies on the east coast of North America. The colonists all belonged to the Anglo-Saxon race and shared the same ethnic origin, identity, language, heritage, culture, education, history and physical characteristics. Their new home was governed by England and they were bound by the same laws and allegiance to the British monarch. The land had been claimed by Britain and the first arrivals considered themselves to be settlers, rather than immigrants. </span>
