Trading post between them and the states
It can be helpful when:
- The intervention occurs with a humanitarian purpose, as in a country that just had a couple of its cities wasted by a natural disaster, like a tsunami or tornado.
- Or in a country which its population has been suffering from hunger for decades due to political crises or coups
It can be ineffective or even destructive when:
- It's a military extreme intervention on a city or country that although on war, it's still very populated by civilians. Like it was in the War on Terror campaign, started by the US after the 9/11 terrorist assault, with American invasion on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and others. It ended up being effective, with even the fall of Al-Qaeda's terrorist organization leader in 2011, but in the process several cases of violent acts against and deaths of civilians were reported.
Although, 1. He was the first president he had to set the example. 2. He was also a famous general, and had to make sure to keep everything straight.
A. Christ's crucifixion.
Jesus Christ was supposedly tortured and killed on the cross in Isreal, leading the Latin cross (one central beam with two "arms" on either side, slightly more than halfway up ✝) to become a symbol of Christianity.
"<span>because the trend of Chinese immigrants to large urban cities harmed the industrialization of the US economy" is the best option but there were wavering levels of truth to this. </span>
