1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
13

In your journal, create a chart outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the north and south moving into the Civil War. Use

your chart to write a paragraph comparing an contrasting the two regions and which region you believe had the advantage and why.
You are supposed to write a paragraph relating to your chart talking about which side had a greater advantage.... (The North or The South)...

10 points
Brainliest for correct answer

P.S:
The chart that it is relating to is the link that I attached...

History
2 answers:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Whatever she said 0-0

Explanation:

Up there

        ^

         |

         |

       

garri49 [273]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The North had a better advantage in the civil war because they had a better economy, a larger population, and more transporation.  The North was more revolutionized than the south because they had factories that helped produce more materials for war. The South's economy was based on agriculture and slave labor, meaning that they had fewer weapons than the North because they couldn't produce them. The North's larger population was a big advantage because more people meant more soldiers for war. The North having more transportation, such as railroads was a big advantage too. The North used the railroads to transport guns, men, food, animals, and medical supplies.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What problems did jay and pinkney treaties address
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

Jay's Treaty addressed the problems that arose out of Britain's ongoing seizure of American ships leaving from the West Indies. It also addressed Britain's continued possession of forts in the Northwest Territories. Pinckney's Treaty, like Jay's Treaty, helped reduce frontier tensions.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Is Libel supported by freedom of speech?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

If it is written down, it's called "libel" whereas if it's spoken, it's called "slander." Defamation law attempts to balance the freedom of speech and open exchange of ideas without giving someone permission to run around spreading lies about another that may harm his or her reputation, ability to earn a living, etc.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these situations was not a result of the Articles of Union?
alexgriva [62]
The Acts of Union were two Acts of Parliament: the Union with Scotland Act 1706 passed by the Parliament of England, and the Union with England Act passed in 1707 by the Parliament of Scotland.

They put into effect the terms of the Treaty of Union that had been agreed on 22 July 1706, following negotiation between commissioners representing the parliaments of the two countries.

By the two Acts, the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland—which at the time were separate states with separate legislatures, but with the same monarch—were, in the words of the Treaty, "United into One Kingdom by the Name of Great Britain".

The two countries had shared a monarch since the Union of the Crowns in 1603 when King James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne from his double first cousin twice removed, Queen Elizabeth I.

Although described as a Union of Crowns, until 1707 there were, in fact, two separate Crowns resting on the same head (as opposed to the implied creation of a single Crown and a single Kingdom, exemplified by the later Kingdom of Great Britain).

There had been three attempts in 1606, 1667, and 1689 to unite the two countries by Acts of Parliament, but it was not until the early 18th century that both political establishments came to support the idea, albeit for different reasons.

The Acts took effect on 1 May 1707. On this date, the Scottish Parliament and the English Parliament united to form the Parliament of Great Britain, based in the Palace of Westminster in London, the home of the English Parliament.

Hence, the Acts are referred to as the Union of the Parliaments.

On the Union, the historian Simon Schama said "What began as a hostile merger, would end in a full partnership in the most powerful going concern in the world ... it was one of the most astonishing transformations in European history."

So I'm guessing, that the answer is D.
<span>
"Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector."

Hoped I helped! Please correct me if I was incorrect. Thanks!

</span>



3 0
3 years ago
Which statement explains why president Andrew Jackson had little influence over reconstruction policy during his term in office
pantera1 [17]

Resources. Brazil is a very large country with many mineral resources. Among the important mineral resources are iron ore, manganese, gold, diamonds, and bauxite. Manganese is a metal similar to iron. Bauxite is the ore from which aluminum is made.

Brazil also raises many important farm products. More coffee is raised in Brazil than in any other country. This industry supplies many workers with jobs. Brazil also raises sugar cane, cacao, (from which comes cocoa and chocolate), cotton, rice, corn, potatoes, and wheat.

Animals of commercial value raised in Brazil include hogs, cattle, and sheep. Cattle are raised in the south and south-central states. Sheep are raised in the Sertão Region.

Brazil's numerous rivers and streams provide a home for fish and furnish water power to make electricity. They also form an important network of water transportation to carry goods from the interior to the coastal ports.

In recent years, persons and industries moved into South America's interior. They cut down trees and leveled some of the rain forests, especially near the Amazon. In 1992, Brazil held an "Earth Summit" to discuss ways to solve this problem. People from 176 countries were there.

8 0
3 years ago
Is Duncan a fool for going to Macbeth's castle and not suspecting the danger posed to him there by Macbeth and lady Macbeth why
Sonbull [250]
Is Duncan a fool? No.

Reasons Why: 
Reason one: Duncan isn’t a fool for going to his house but a fool for not having protection while he rested. Reason two: Duncan isn’t a fool for simply trusting a man that helped win a war. Reason three: Duncan isn’t a fool because he didn’t know Macbeth was plotting to kill him. He was blinded because he thought Macbeth was a good Samaritan. Conclude:

Duncan wasn’t a fool but he was foolish to trust a fool that plotted to kill him and succeed. Duncan wasn’t and still isn’t a fool because he trusted a simile and mustache. Duncan trusted the wrong man that did good deed but the lesson learned here is that a person can do well just as much as a person can do wrong and that greed is the ultimate seed to.
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What ideal did the antifederalists find the constitution lacked?
    6·2 answers
  • What does Congress do once the requirements of the enabling act are met
    5·1 answer
  • One of the main ideas of Jacksonian democracy was the expansion of suffrage. By the time Jackson was elected to his second term
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following are some characteristics of democracy in Ancient Athens? Select the two correct
    13·2 answers
  • The Glorious Revolution of 1688 __________.
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the importance of the Italian city-states to the Renaissance.
    10·2 answers
  • 10 POINTS!!! HELP!
    14·2 answers
  • After the 1964 election, President Johnson believed that
    12·2 answers
  • Write an essay that answers the following question: Was the United States justified in going to war against Mexico in 1846? Use
    6·2 answers
  • Think of some Pros to mandatory Voting and some Cons to mandatory Voting.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!