1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
3 years ago
12

Help me to write a letter about the marijuana debate

History
1 answer:
Darya [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

There has been a huge increase in legalization and use of cannabis (marijuana) in recent years. Despite federal prohibition of all cannabis use, 33 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical purposes; 11 of them and DC have further legalized it for recreational uses, and 15 other states have decriminalized marijuana use to some extent.

Each step raises ethical issues for health care providers, patients, and government officials.

The case in favor of using marijuana for medical purposes was made in a letter from the World Health Organization to the secretary general of the United Nations on January 24, 2019. Some 30 countries around the world had legalized medical marijuana as of 2018.

The letter followed an expert committee’s conclusion that cannabis and cannabinoids derived from the marijuana plant are relatively low risk and carry positive health benefits, including pain reduction and improvement of motor functions in patients with Parkinson’s. It called for more research to better evaluate the benefits and harms.

An expert committee appointed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine also raised some red flags about marijuana use in a report issued in January 2017. The panel considered more than 10,000 scientific abstracts published since 1999 and reached almost 100 separate conclusions.

Therapeutically, it found evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids could reduce pain symptoms, the muscle spasms associated with multiple sclerosis, and the nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy. On the downside, it found suggestive evidence that cannabis use prior to driving increases the risk of a motor vehicle accidents and, in states where cannabis use is legal, increased the risk that young children would find and ingest the substance in overdose quantities.

Parents and other adults surely have an ethical obligation to keep cannabis out of the reach of children.

The panel found “moderate evidence” that cannabis can lead to abuse of other substances such as alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs. It also found “limited evidence” that cannabis can impair learning, memory, and attention, even in individuals who have stopped smoking cannabis. It can also impair subsequent academic achievement, social relationships, and may increase the risk of unemployment and low income.

The panel cited a recent nationwide survey which estimated that 22 million Americans aged 12 and older had used marijuana in the last 30 days and that 90 percent of the adult users used it primarily for recreational purpose while only 10 percent used it solely for medical purposes. Around 36 percent used it for both purposes. This is an alarming increase in the recreational markets where oversight is minimal.

The risks of rapid expansion have been documented in Colorado, the first state to legalize recreational marijuana. Edibles there produced a disproportionate share of pot-related crises in emergency rooms, according to a report in The New York Times on March 25. Edibles were also more likely than inhaled pot to cause severe intoxication, acute psychiatric symptoms in people with no history of psychiatric illness, and cardiovascular problems. The lead author of the report, published in the April 16 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, told reporter Roni Caryn Rabin that he does not think edibles should be available in the retail recreational market.

Meanwhile, the state medical societies in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Delaware issued a joint statement in March opposing the legalization of recreational marijuana because there is not enough research proving it is safe.

Even though two-thirds of the states have legalized marijuana for medicinal purposes, enrolling some two to three million people in their programs, the vast majority of health care systems won’t provide cannabis to their patients or allow them to bring their own supply. The facilities are reluctant because cannabis remains classified by the government as a schedule 1 drug, making it technically illegal to use for any purpose, including medical.

The greatest risk to public health is probably posed by cannabidiol oils (CBD) added to edible food products, such as cookies and brownies. The problem is that CBD is not psychoactive and does not cause the highs characterized by THC. It can take hours before it kicks in, so users may mistakenly believe it isn’t working and eat some more, compounding the risk. The edibles may also contain too much or too little of the supposedly active ingredient or contain toxic contaminants introduced during production, which is not tightly regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

You might be interested in
In what region in China did Nomadic Herders roam?
dusya [7]
They were mostly found on the south side but was sometimes found on East side
8 0
3 years ago
Which country controlled Vietnam before world war ll?
lbvjy [14]
France controlled Vietnam before World War II,  Vietnam gained independence after World War II but France ruled the country until 1954.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the colonists choose to do the Boston tea party?
MaRussiya [10]
The British were taxing the tea and being violent towards the colonists so the colonist got mad and dressed as Indians and threw all the tea in the harbor 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help can you guys answer these for me?!
Zina [86]
Paul Revere's engraving of the Boston Massacre<span>, 1770. By the beginning of 1770, there were 4,000 British soldiers in </span>Boston<span>, a city with 15,000 inhabitants, and tensions were running high. ... A shot rang out, and then several soldiers fired their weapons.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why did Egypt's president Nasser seize the Suez Canal in 1956?
Ymorist [56]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "The canal was seized to negotiate better trading relations with Britain, France, and the United States."  Egypt's president Nasser seize the Suez Canal in 1956 because The canal was seized to negotiate better trading relations with Britain, France, and the United States.<span>
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The reasons why president Cleveland's reputation was considered the exception to the rule for presidents from the 1870's through
    7·2 answers
  • During the Yalta Conference, what did President Roosevelt promise Premier Stalin in exchange for the Soviet Union joining the Pa
    11·1 answer
  • Regarding the Magna Carta, which statement is false?
    15·1 answer
  • Diagrams describe where something is located.
    12·1 answer
  • Which idea is part of the philosophical tradition of Confucianism?
    12·1 answer
  • What is Jared Diamonds explanation for why the spanish had advanced to steel swords while incas were still making tools and weap
    13·1 answer
  • What measures distance on a map​
    7·1 answer
  • ¿Por qué hay desigualdad entre la progresión geométrica y la progresión aritmética?
    15·1 answer
  • Plessy VS. Ferguson Supreme Court Cases Acelas The Plessy vs. Ferguson case stemmed from an issue in reference to which of the f
    14·1 answer
  • Crowded small apartments where 12-13 adults could be sleeping in the same room
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!