Answer:
I think the Dawes Act was intended to harm Native Americans because the Act was breaking up reservations and forcing Native Americans to live more separately thereby splitting up their culture and it forced them to assimilate into European culture.
Explanation:
Explanation:
The European nations were able to conquer large sections of Africa in those times because they had more advanced military technology. Europeans easily adapted to African climate and topography. But Also, Europe, has more advances in technology in warfare, transportations. Also their governments are strong and stable due to ones careful rule.
But the real reason for European dominant is because they really and I mean really focus on their militaristic aspect as which they relied on for stability, conquest, and glory because thousands of years, Kings and some Queens are tought the ways of war and how war can give more than just territory and as a matter of fact Kings had trained themselves in Europe for milania, so not just did Kings evolve but the technology to fight among themselves were drastically improved as well.
This is all the information I have sadly.
<u>The answer is that a peace treaty was signed, but the settlers did not follow it.</u>
The British Government came to the conclusion that settlers and Indians should remain separate. On October 7, 1763, the Crown drafted the Royal Decree of 1763, through which he wanted to reorganize the North American territories
The officers drew a line of separation between the British colonies and the lands of the natives west of the Appalachian Mountains, creating an immense Indian Reservation that ranged from the Appalachians to the Mississippi River and from Florida to Newfoundland. By prohibiting settlers from entering Indian lands, the British government hoped to avoid new events such as the Pontiac Rebellion.
The effects of the Pontiac war were noted for a long time. Because the Decree recognized some indigenous rights over the lands they occupied, it became known as the Indian Bill of Rights.
<em>However, the Royal Decree of 1763 did not prevent the British from attempting to expand westward, so the Indians were forced to form new resistance movements. </em>The first began in 1767 after a meeting organized by the Shawnee.
Answer:
no it just freed slaves african americans where still held down by society
Their government had needed lots of money after the war, and the national bank helped with that.
