Answer:
here ya go this is the steps
Answer:
option (c) $25 million
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
The marginal propensity to consume in Frugalia, MPC = 0.60
Increase in spending = $10 million
Now,
The total increase in income
= 
× Increase in spending
on substituting the respective values, we get
= 
× $10 million
= 
× $10 million
or
= 2.5 × $10 million
or
= $25 million
Hence,
The answer is option (c) $25 million
Answer:
The correct answer is Contrast and repetition.
Explanation:
Contrast: it has to do with sensory stimuli that allow highlighting elements or areas in a composition through the opposition or difference between them, that is, in a graphic design, a contrast is generated when there is a notable difference between two elements.
Repeat: the repetition is nothing more than identical identical forms that appear more than once in the design, that is to say, it would be a question of using the same element several times and distributed throughout the composition.
It is very important to resort to repetition especially when we are designing a graphic product that consists of several pages (catalog, magazine, etc.).
The repetition gives unity to the whole design, consistency and cohesion. Sometimes even on single page products, such as a diptych or triptych, it gives the feeling of continuity and that everything is "well tied". However, it should not be exceeded in its use. Repeating one or two graphic patterns is fine, but after three it would not be correct.
Answer:
Total cost is equal to $81300
So option (c) will be correct answer.
Explanation:
Actual unit of production = 42000
Cost of per equivalent material = $1.10
Equivalent cost of material = 
$
Equivalent cost of labor = 
$
Therefore total cost of production = $46200+$35100 = $81300
So total cost will be $81300
Therefore option (c) is the correct answer
Answer:
voidable title
Explanation:
A voidable title is considered good and valid title until voided.
For example, I purchase a PS4 from my nephew who is a minor and I sell it to my neighbor, and my neighbor purchased it on good faith. My nephew can decide to void the contract because he was a minor, but since I passed good title to my neighbor while the contract was valid, my neighbor doesn't have to return the PS4.
The difference with a void title is that a void title was never good and valid.
On the other hand, if I had stolen the PS4, I would never have good title over it, and I sell it to my neighbor. The rightful owner of the PS4 can claim it back and my neighbor must return it because the contract was void since I never had good title on the PS4.
