One argument was that <span>it was critical for the south's agricultural economy.
</span>
Answer:
The answer is option D "Pro-choice on the issue of abortion"
Explanation:
Progressivism, in the US, political and social-change development that carried significant changes to American legislative issues and government during the initial twenty years of the twentieth century.
Progressivism reformers put forth the main exhaustive attempt inside the American setting to address the issues that emerged with the development of an advanced metropolitan and modern culture. The U.S. populace almost multiplied somewhere in the range of 1870 and 1900.
Urbanization and movement expanded at quick rates and were joined by a move from nearby limited scope assembling and business to huge scope industrial facility creation and monster public companies. Innovative forward leaps and furious looks for new business sectors and wellsprings of capital caused remarkable financial development.
The setting in “”Words On Fire” that relate to the plot/theme is that it explains the peaceful living of 12-year-old Audra on the farm of her parent.
<h3>What is the setting in Words on Fire?</h3>
The settings explains the story of 12-year-old Audra, and the quit and peaceful living in the farm of her parent in Lithuania .
The theme which is the main idea or underlying meaning that is been explore in short story serves as the main idea that the text is surrounding.
It should be noted that Setting which can be regarded as the time as well as the place that is been used in writing a story is a literary element of literature and can be seen in the "Words On Fire" in how Audra was able to have a peaceful living in Lithuania with her parents as at that time
Therefore, settings in this story, which was introduced during the exposition of the story, to let the audience know about places of the characters.
Learn more about theme at:
brainly.com/question/11600913
#SPJ1
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
