Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Please attach the graph if you can. Otherwise, I cannot answer this question
Answer:
Explanation:
B or C are the benefits of sole proprietorship,
D can be used by any organization,
so only A, raise capital by selling stock in company.
Answer:
b. The standardization and grading function
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the function of marketing that does this is the standardization and grading function. This helps the customers with buying and selling of goods by sample or description. In other words by sorting them by a specific size and quality so that customers already understand what it is and do not have to bother with a detailed assessment.