<span>In the Elstad case the court ruled that
the suspect’s statement that put him in the act, or admitted guilt was unsolicited. He was taken to the station and Maranda
before he gave a second statement.
During the questioning of Seibert, five days after the act, the officer
questioned her for 30 to 40 minutes obtaining a confession that caused a death
in the fire of her trailer. After taking
a 20 minute break the officer came back, read the Maranda and obtained a signed
waiver. Then got another statement. The
District Court suppressed the prewarning statement but admitted the post
warning one, and Seibert was convicted of second-degree murder. The Missouri
Court of Appeals affirmed, finding the case indistinguishable from Oregon
v. Elstad,
in which this Court held that a suspect's
unwarned inculpatory statement made during a brief exchange at his house did
not make a later, fully warned inculpatory statement inadmissible. In
reversing, the State Supreme Court held that, because the interrogation was
nearly continuous, the second statement, which was clearly the product of the
invalid first statement, should be suppressed; and distinguished Elstad
on the ground that the warnings had not intentionally been withheld</span>
All three religions acknowledge that Moses was a prophet of God. Not only that but, the three religions all believe in, an omniscient God, prophets, and life after death. They are also all based on the belief of god. There’s a huge difference like,
Judaism believes there is one God who cannot be made up of parts. To attempt to divide God's oneness is seen as a pagan throwback to many gods. Islam embraces an immaterial, invisible God -- one to be intensely feared in His omnipotence. God could not have children (or a Son) for this blurs the divine/human distinction of an Ultimate God. Christians hold fast to the trinity of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. To Christians, God gives a revelation of Himself through the flesh, Jesus Christ, God Incarnate.
But the huge thing that makes them similar is that they all are based on the believe of god.
Answer: c) Ethnic background.
Explanation:
Persuasive speech is used for helping the audience to understand , explain and educate about a certain topic so that they be aware and work in certain direction according to their point-of-view.
According to the question, while giving persuasive speech on immigration reform , the audience is being informed about improving legal migration and eliminating any sort of illegal migration. People's ethnic background should be considered as immigration involves country ,culture, religion etc and according to audience ethics speech should be given.
Other option are incorrect because gender , measurement , sexual position and education are not the part related with immigration reform .Thus, the correct option is option(c).
Answer: luminary honest, the continued success of the Commodore 64 has taken a lot of industry luminaries totally by surprise.
Explanation:PLEASE MARK AS BRAIN LIST
