Answer:
The populist moment of 2016 drove multiple academic disciplines together in a
Kierkegaardian way. They realized that complacently living life forward in liberal
democracies now required an understanding life backwards of in terms of tribalism and
identity. An emerging consensus—that multiple ethnic identities should be contained within a
greater single civic/creedal identity—highlighted an enduring tension between two ready
components in sports: gamesmanship (the tribal reality of winning, mostly through
professionalism) and sportsmanship (the rule-of-law ideal of playing well, ideally through
amateurism). American football’s unique provenance as a highly commercial and physical
game within higher education’s ideals of intellectual and noncommercial educational
excellence, offers a unique study of the power of gamesmanship to shape sportsmanship while
illuminating its realistic and historic contained boundaries. This study anchors the
Explanation:
The correct answer is "robber barons."
<em>Industrialists during the age of big business were viewed as robber barons. They controlled a large amount of wealth.</em>
In was during the late 1800s that the term big business was coined. It was a not so good term that showed disrespect for big corporations that had unfair business practices. With the merger of other companies, the big corporations eliminated their competitors and many companies ceased to exist. These big corporations had the money and the power to influence officials in government and legislation. People didn't like big corporation's practices and protest arose as well as labor union participation.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "the Platt Amendment." The choice that would be violated if the United States were to annex Cuba following a conflict between the two countries is that of the <span>Platt Amendment</span>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
An Oligarchy is a select few people ruling. A democracy is eveyone ruling (the people)
<u>Answer:</u>
Judicial review is the power of the Judicial Branch to review laws, Executive orders, and Executive acts to ensure they are Constitutional and are not in conflict with higher authorities.
Option: (A)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Judicial review ensures that the laws made by legislative and executed by executive doesn’t violate the terms of a constitution.
- Judicial review is one among the "balances" and "checks" in separation of power.
- Judicial review supervises legislative and executive to form laws that doesn’t conflicts with the 'constitution'.
- Judicial review invalids the laws that violates the 'terms of a constitution'.
