1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madam [21]
3 years ago
6

WILL GIVE BRANLIEST How do you think your life might be different if you lived under a dictatorship instead of a democracy?

History
2 answers:
EleoNora [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I feel like I would possibly be given little to no rights. As a minority myself, it'll be most difficult for me to survive under dictatorship. I wouldn't have any rights as a minority, possibly no self worth, etc. Dictators usually pick out the best people to be treated equally so that possibly will not apply to me or others. So, in conclusion, it'll be much different under a dictatorship than a democracy because of who I am as a person

Explanation:

Nadya [2.5K]3 years ago
8 0
Dictatorship is extremely sad. Humans deserve rights and their own individuality. I would be unhappy and I wouldn’t have any way of expressing myself without worrying something bad may happen to me.
You might be interested in
Was the Roman Empire effective at promoting the common good?"
Furkat [3]

Explanation:

The Roman Empire which origins can be argued to either the ascent of Julius Caesar to Dictator, or the acceptance of Octavian Caesar as Augustus (First Citizen).  Basically, sometime in the 2nd have of the 1st century B.C.E.  At that time, the Roman state or Senatus and Populesque Romanus: Senate and People of Rome or SPQR) held an extreme number of treaties with it's neighbors.  Few of the people were considered part of the Republic and only Roman Citizens could vote or hold offices such as Senator, Quaestor, Tribune, or Consul.  Most civilizations governed themselves and had a Roman Governor.  These "Allies" would also supply soldiers for Auxiliaries to the Roman Legions.  At some point in the transition from Roman Republic to Roman Empire an incorporation began of citizenship.  This would allow previously non-citizens of the allied civilizations to be granted rights under Roman Law.  The concept had never been incorporated by any other civilization.  It had always previously been stipulated that family descent would delineate citizenship.  This was the first and foremost strength of the Roman Empire the ability to amalgamate it's people into a citizenship.  One of the best ways it was able to unify the other populations was the use of it's Language.  Because one had to understand Latin to understand it's Laws it became necessary for the people of the Empire to speak the same language and therefore Latin spread to every corner of the empire and displaced many languages in other territories, (this is why there are the Romance Languages, Spanish, Italian, French, and Romanian, all were parts of the Roman Empire for extreme periods of time).  The next aspect and probably the most distinguished is the Roman Army.  It was the greatest military force of professional soldiers in the Ancient World.  It's equipment was standardized as was the training.  The soldiers were however more than just well trained and well armed.  They were laborers and engineers.  Under Julius Caesar they were able to build a bridge across the Rhine in less than two weeks, without machines.  They would construct Roads, Aqueducts, Forts, Towns, Bridges, Temples, Walls, and whatever else they needed.  This Army/Labor force was mobile and terrifying, drawing on the experiences and fame of Julius Caesar and his memoirs about the Gallic Wars.  He and future Emperors would annihilate whole populations of rebellious civilizations (Gauls & Dacians come to mind, also don't forget about the expulsion of the Jews from Judea).  All of these factors allowed Roman Law to reign supreme and the peace or "Pax Romana" that occurred for several centuries allowed trade to flourish making Rome the center of the civilized world the envy of the Barbarians.    

When you take into account all of theses aspects 1.) Granting of Citizenship 2.) Language 3.) Military force 4.) Construction of military yet civilian necessities 5.) Flourishing trade coupled with extended periods of peace, it becomes easy to understand how one Civilization could be denoted as the Greatest of the Ancient world.  To contrast that, after the fall of Rome, Europe entered into a Dark Age that would last nearly 1200 years.  

Also unlike what the genius Phil said, there are many civilizations and Nations that lasted after 455 that attempted to use Rome as it's title and claim legitimacy to the Roman Empire, (Holy Roman Empire, Even the Germans use of Kaiser which is a translation of Caesar, the Russian use of Czar is a translation from Caesar and is suppose to represent the inheritance of the Byzantine Empire which was the remnants of the Eastern Roman Empire, lastly it can be argued the the Pope is the present ruler of the Roman Empire through the spirit of Catholicism).

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a characteristic of Fascist governments?
kotykmax [81]
<span>"d. Religious freedom</span>" would not be a characteristic of fascist governments, since these governments do not tolerate anything that may deviate from their political party platform. 
6 0
4 years ago
Who was the leader of the political machine that controlled New York City in the late 1800s
saul85 [17]
William Tweed or better known as "Boss Tweed" if you're referring to Tammany Hall 
6 0
3 years ago
All of the following are true statements about the economy of the middle colonies, EXCEPT:
Dahasolnce [82]

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "d. Disease killed more people in the middle colonies because of its cooler climate, resulting in a labor shortage." All of the following are true statements about the economy of the middle colonies, EXCEPT Disease killed more people in the middle colonies because of its cooler climate, resulting in a labor shortage.


6 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know the dates of the temperance movement when did it start and when it ended ?
alisha [4.7K]

Answer:

started: Saratoga in 1800, New York, in 1808 and in Massachusetts in 1813.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these is an example of the line marked "Artificial Price"?
    13·2 answers
  • Information that is unedited, unfiltered, and provides a record of a specific event or action falls into what category? news opi
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these is an accurate description of a Mesopotamian ziggurat?
    8·1 answer
  • The philosophy of transcendentalism was based on the idea that
    8·2 answers
  • ????????????????????WHO IS BILL COSBY
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following reasons allowed Great Britain to further its colonization in the New World? (4 points) They defeated the
    15·2 answers
  • What does cahan means by the phrase"a polyglot vistor to ellis island"?
    7·1 answer
  • Pleaseeee i will give you the brainliesttt!
    5·2 answers
  • Which side did the native americans support during the war in the west
    5·2 answers
  • Question 2 of 10<br> Which of these was a colonial action that led to the French and Indian War?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!