I’m so sorry but I don’t have the book your looking for to solve your answer.
Answer:
They shot the six cabinet ministers at half-past six in the morning against the wall of a hospital. There were pools of water in the courtyard. There were wet dead leaves on the paving of the courtyard. It rained hard. All the shutters of the hospital were nailed shut. One of the ministers was sick with typhoid. Two soldiers carried him downstairs and out into the rain. They tried to hold him up against the wall but he sat down in a puddle of water. The other five stood very quietly against the wall. Finally, the officer told the soldiers it was no good trying to make him stand up. When they fired the first volley he was sitting down in the water with his head on his knees. I kept myself alive. the streets clean and deserted, I was walking to the station.
Explanation:
Hello. You did not present the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to answer this question if a reading of the text is made. However, we can consider that it is only possible that an author is able to connect the various points of a claim, through the use of a correct and efficient text structure. This is because it is the text structure, which manages to connect the dots in a text.
This structure can be chronological (when connecting the dots through a timeline), sequential (when presenting a sequence of things or events), problem and solution (when presenting how problems were solved), cause and effect (when presenting the cause of some events), comparison and contrast (when it shows the similarities and differences between two elements).
Therefore, to answer this question, you must read the text and identify the type of textual structure that the author uses when submitting a claim to create a monument to Colonel Young.
The answer to this question is:
<span>Why must every proposition in an argument be tested using a logical sequence?
</span>"to discover if it makes logical sense"
Hoped This Helped, <span>
Calderonsairasov445o
Your Welcome :) </span>
If my memory serves my well, the reason why Squealer changes the Commandments is B. to reflect the pigs' adapting human qualities. This option looks the most accurate and, as for me, best represents the reason of change. Hope you will agree with me, regards!
