1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frozen [14]
3 years ago
15

Why was the colonial reaction to the stamp act so different as compared to the sugar act and quartering act

History
1 answer:
Licemer1 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Stamp Act, passed in 1765, was a direct tax imposed by the British Parliament on the colonies of British America. ... Because of its potential widespread application to the colonial economy, the Stamp Act was judged by the colonists to be a more dangerous assault on their rights than the Sugar Act.

You might be interested in
Who is the only person ever to take the oath of office and also administer it to another president-elect?
Blababa [14]
William Howard Taft, our 27th president.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should the United States Have Annexed the Philippines?
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

The U.S. should have annexed the Philippines because it would’ve given us a larger sphere of power and influence. However, you could argue this larger sphere of power is bad because this is what got the Spanish in the conflict in the first place, the more land they occupied, the more revolutions from the people, and the annexation of the Philippines did in fact cause a revolt and a more deadly one, 4,200 Americans and over 20,000 Filipino soldiers were killed, and 200,000 Filipinos civilians were killed from famine, disease, and violence.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What was Tammany Hall?
erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

The answer is (B) A political machine.

4 0
4 years ago
When did the medieval time begin and end?
OLga [1]
5th to the 15th century<span>.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was life before and after medicine??
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
Life before medicine was probably honestly horrible, there was nothing to cure diseases, sickness and probably led to more deaths when people got sick because they had nothing to fight it off with, now that we have medicine we have been given chances to beat the sickness and to become healthier.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who benefited least from a sharecropping arrangement? A-sharecroppers B-land C-owners share-tenants D-seed suppliers
    10·2 answers
  • How did Spanish colonies differ from French and English colonies?
    10·2 answers
  • The Analects refers to? A.Invaders in the north B.The teachings of confucius C.a superior class of people D.The most important r
    8·2 answers
  • What are stock dividends
    6·1 answer
  • What is meant by due process and provide an example?
    6·1 answer
  • The invasion of normandy was accomplished largely by what type of vehicle
    6·1 answer
  • The paleolithic period is ____________________
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following are powers given to the president in Article Il of the Constitution? (Select all that apply.)
    6·1 answer
  • Was the cotton gin invention good or bad for the United States
    7·2 answers
  • Who was the first african american to earn a doctorate from harvard
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!