1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinil7 [7]
3 years ago
6

Why were the border states important to both sides in the Civil War?

History
2 answers:
algol [13]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:they were vital economic forces and transportation links, and the army could strengthen either side. Also, a border state on one side could help an support for the war Keeping control of the border states played an important role in the victory for the Union. These states gave the Union the advantage in troops, factories, and money.

Explanation:me learning the same thing

Readme [11.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The border states, which had not seceded, but separated the United States from the Confederate States, were of great importance to the Northern war strategy. In order to win the war, the Union Army would need to pass through the border states to invade the South. On the other hand, the border states, if they joined the Confederacy, would make it extremely easy for the Confederacy to attack and occupy Washington D.C.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statement in revelation 22 stresses the accuracy of the prophecies in revelation
labwork [276]

I think theres 2 that you could argue.

Revelation 22:6

[6] And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.

This says that the prophesies are true and God has sent his angle to prepare for them to come true.

Revelation 22:16

[16] I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

This again says that Jesus has sent an angel to prepare the world for the prophesies.

6 0
3 years ago
Which explains why the price indicated by p2 on the graph is higher than the equilibrium price? As prices rise, quantity demande
blondinia [14]

The economy operates according to the law of supply and demand for goods and services. According to this theory, the interaction between supply and demand for a good or service fits and the vector of adjustment is price.

If the price is high, there is more supply than demand. If the price is low, there is more demand than supply. If demand increases, price increases and supply increases. If demand falls, the price falls. That is, the price makes the interaction. There will be a moment where the quantity offered is exactly equal to the quantity demanded, at which point the price practiced is the equilibrium price.

So if an economy is in equilibrium at a time and then the price charged is higher than the equilibrium price, it means that demand has gotten higher than supply.

<u>However, none of the alternatives would explain why a price is charged above the equilibrium price.</u> <u>The answer is the reverse of what is written in alternative (A)</u>. The truth is this: As the quantity demanded rises, the price rises above the equilibrium price.  <u>This is the answer</u>.

The alternative (B) is true, although it does not answer the question of the problem. If prices rise, demand falls. This is because the high price discourages consumption.  

BTW, I'm an economist and I'm sure.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 3 more answers
The most important reason for the growth of labor unions in the latter half of the 19th century was
SIZIF [17.4K]
I believe the answer is D. The way the workers were treated by big business and big industry.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone please help me!!what’s the answer??
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

c is the one and only answer for that question.

Explanation:

I GEST PUT the thing

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A dictator in ancient Rome gained total authority by the Senate in times
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

True, the Senate could vote absolute power to a dictator.

Explanation:

Dictator.

Dictator, in the Roman Republic, a temporary magistrate with extraordinary powers, nominated by a consul on the recommendation of the Senate and confirmed by the Comitia Curiata (a popular assembly).

Dictators were then named for lesser functions such as the holding of elections in certain cases.

The Senate could vote to grant absolute power to one man, called a dictator, for a temporary period. During the first 300 years of the Republic, dictators were often called on when Rome faced an invasion or some internal danger.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes an effect of the Arab-Israeli War of 1948?
    13·2 answers
  • President Andrew Johnson's leniency toward south and his vetoes of legislation that favored former slaves angered?
    14·2 answers
  • In the third paragraph of the excerpt, which of the following pieces of evidence does de Gante use to support his argument about
    10·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph explaining why the US went to war with Spain ( a complete paragraph is 5 sentences).
    15·1 answer
  • Evaluate. 4 to the 3 power IXL I AM IN NEED OF DIER HELP
    5·1 answer
  • are you technically a member of the civilian labor force? explain why you are or are not considered part of this group
    13·1 answer
  • What can you infer about the economy, beliefs, and technology of the Mongols from the descriptions given?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the result of stalin’s refusal to retreat from stalingrad? german forces were able to push farther and farther to the e
    8·1 answer
  • Close reading: according to lines 1 - 3, what has happened to the british settlers (english traders) who were able to escape the
    6·1 answer
  • What is a life history? do primates have a fast life history or a slow life history - what factors inform your answer?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!