1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
2 years ago
12

How was culture evolved over time ?

History
1 answer:
ycow [4]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Culture is made up of customs, attitudes, and beliefs that are unique to each group of people. ... New philosophical ideas and technological advances can lead to cultural change. Cultural change can also occur through diffusion, when contact with other cultures and ideas are transferred.

You might be interested in
5. How is the use of antibiotics in humans making pathogens more resistant to antibiotics?
AlexFokin [52]

Antibiotic resistance occurs when bacteria change in response to the use of these medicines. Bacteria, not humans or animals, become antibiotic-resistant. These bacteria may infect humans and animals, and the infections they cause are harder to treat than those caused by non-resistant bacteria.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true of the Three-Fifths Compromise?
IrinaK [193]
The answer to this one is B
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the ultimate failure of WWI?
Leni [432]

Answer:

The immediate cause of World War I that made the aforementioned items come into play (alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism) was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. In June 1914, a Serbian-nationalist terrorist group called the Black Hand sent groups to assassinate the Archduke.

7 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Intolerable act cause the American revolution?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in the mid-1770s. The British instated the acts to make an example of the colonies after the Boston Tea Party , and the outrage they caused became the major push that led to the outbreak American Revolution in 1775.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does an unsecured loan have a higher interest rate that an secured loan
    15·2 answers
  • 1.In your opinion, was the use of atomic weapons justified under the circumstances?
    11·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo afectó Asoka el comercio en el imperio? ​
    7·1 answer
  • What punishment would a corporate violator of the sherman antitrust act face
    13·2 answers
  • Washington established which of the following even though it was not mentioned in the constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • Less than what percentage of the Japanese people are farmers
    8·2 answers
  • When was volleyball invented
    11·2 answers
  • Describe the Five Pillars of Islam
    11·2 answers
  • Why was Oklahoma admitted as one state instead of two?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Spain help the Americans in the Revolutionary War?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!