Robin Hood and the foresters can not only be seen as being
quite different from each other; they can be seen as exact polar opposites of
each other. This is so because while
Robin Hood was nice to people, the foresters were just the opposite—they could
be seen as being cruel to people. To
focus on this a bit closer it can be seen that while Robin Hood was honest and
helpful, the foresters were dishonest and hurtful.
The excerpt from the Riddle of the Rosetta Stone describes the effect of the conflict between the British and the French is The French were finally forced to surrender to the British.
<h3>What is The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone?</h3>
The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone is a book which discover some amazing facts about a stone that is en carved by old Egyptian language, was written in ancient time.
Thus, the correct option is D, The French were finally forced to surrender to the British.
Learn more about The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone
brainly.com/question/16575296
#SPJ1
Beggining from the line "The discussion thus tending to become more theological...", it was clear that the charaters would engage in an argument over the boy's health involving their religious beliefs. The characters appear indeed to argue and stand by their own ideas and solutions.
Since there are no options present to choose from, I would say the best statement that describes this cultural divide is: Because of their pride, people would rather yield someone else's life before giving up their differences and cooperate.
Answer:
Explanation:
I'm not sure what text this refers to but in a general context, yes the first-person narrator is trustworthy when he gives his account of the story if s/he was at the place s/he are present at the event they are talking about/narrating
I'm sorry if this isn't much help but its hard to give evidence without knowing what text you are referring too. Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions
