Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis: The department has determined that there should be 40% A’s given, 40% B’s given and 20% C’s given as final grades for the course
If the p-value for this hypothesis test is = 0.000... and this number is lower than the 0.05 significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that from the result of our observation that final grades do not match this grading guidelines.
It means the grading guidelines was exceeded in terms of As, was less in terms of Bs and was higher in terms of Cs i e the grading guidelines was not consistent with what was stated in the null.
Question 11- is 10
question 12- is 36
Question 15- is 58
Continuing from the setup in the question linked above (and using the same symbols/variables), we have




The next part of the question asks to maximize this result - our target function which we'll call

- subject to

.
We can see that

is quadratic in

, so let's complete the square.

Since

are non-negative, it stands to reason that the total product will be maximized if

vanishes because

is a parabola with its vertex (a maximum) at (5, 25). Setting

, it's clear that the maximum of

will then be attained when

are largest, so the largest flux will be attained at

, which gives a flux of 10,800.
Answer:
14 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Using this information, we can form an equation.
Since there are 3 sides in a triangle, and each side increased by 6, that means that the perimeter increased by 18 inches. Down below, I did 3x because there are 3 sides in a triangle.
(This is the equation you'd want to do to get the answer)
3x + 3 * 6 = 60
Simplify:
3x + 18 = 60
Same to both sides
3x = 42
Isolate x:
x = 14
Let me know if you have any questions
Tree C is the proper tree. The first game has the possibility of a win, a loss, or a tie which the first row represents. The second game could also win, lose or tie, meaning each result would have each possibilty for that game.