All categories

2 years ago

HELP NOW!!! POR FAVOR DUE IN 10 MINS

History

2 answers:

Slav-nsk [51]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

I'm Kaiser very nice to help you ♥

Three Branches of American Government

1. Legislative

2. Executive

3. Judicial

Duty of every branch

1. Legislative- The Legislative Branch enacts legislation, confirms or rejects Presidential appointments, and has the authority to declare war. This branch includes Congress (the Senate and House of Representatives) and several agencies that provide support services to Congress.

2. Executive- Executive power is exercised by the government under the leadership of the president. Legislative power is vested in both the government and the two-chamber congress—the Senate (the upper chamber) and the House of Representatives (the lower chamber).

3. Judicial-Judicial power rests with the Supreme Court and the lower courts, as established by law (Art. VIII, sec. 1 of the 1987 Constitution). Its duty is to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable (Art)

Most important branch is :

The Executive Branch-Article II of the Constitution states that the executive branch, with the president as its head, has the power to enforce or carry out the laws of the nation.

Failing branch:

I think it's the JUDICIAL BRANCH

the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had "no influence over either the sword or the purse, ... It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment." Federalist No.

HOPE I HELPED

Aliun [14]2 years ago

3 0

Explanation:

Legislative- Makes laws( congress, house of representatives and senate)

Executive- Carries out the laws ( president, vice president, cabinet, most federal agencies)

Judicial- Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)

Most important? Legislative as with its ability to pass laws in areas of national policy. The laws that it creates apply to the public and some cases private laws.

Failing? The Judicial, as that the descions made are not enforced.

You might be interested in

Help me for a brainlist !!! ( no fooling around )

deff fn [24]

The onset of the Industrial Revolution contribute to the growing rift between the northern and southern states in many ways:

One of which is the fact that the Northern States are more of a mixed economy which are based on industrialization.

Some of the industries include manufacturing, shipping, and lumbering.

The Southern states, however, are based on agriculture and raw materials.

Most of the southern states produced were manufactured in the Northern States. For example, cotton.

Cotton Gin is one of the machines invented during this period, and it is mainly found in the Northern states.

Hence, it is concluded that there are issues that contributed to the growing rift between the northern and southern states in which the industrial revolution is one of them.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/15958610

8 0

2 years ago

Chief justice john marshall declared part of the judiciary act unconstitutional. this was the first time the supreme court exerc

o-na [289]

The United States government operates on a system of checks and balances. If the Judicial branch checks on the Legislative branch, it could fall under the exercise of Judicial Review. The Judiciary Act is a legislation by the Legislative branch. By declaring it unconstitutional, Chief Justice John Marshall is exercising the power of Judicial Review.

5 0

3 years ago

What are some social reforms in the American revolution

Nitella [24]

Rasicm Racism Raaicm Uu

7 0

3 years ago

The people who lived in the city of Teotihuacan were __________. A. merchants from the Maya civilization B. farmers from the Olm

netineya [11]

C would be the best awnser

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Washington said we can't have “national morality" without "religious principles." Do you agree with him? Explain

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:

"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."

There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers