1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmasim [6.3K]
3 years ago
10

IM GIVING BRAINLEIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!
What statement best explains the significance of the Supreme Court decisions McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) for the development of the federal government?
Select one:

They upheld the authority of the national government over the states.

They agreed that states could nullify national laws that they disliked.

They revised the election process for president and vice president.

They shifted some duties of the national government to the states.
History
1 answer:
olganol [36]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

They upheld the authority of the national government over the states.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What european nation ceased to exist after world war 1?
Katen [24]
That would be Czechoslovakia. 
8 0
3 years ago
I Have one question if i was to run for President, in the future!. what would make people want to vote me please and win the ele
alisha [4.7K]
Probably being honest about the US. (Even the bad things) and being honest that you make mistakes, oh and don’t be full Ig yourself
8 0
3 years ago
With Russia’s retreat from the war, Germany was able to concentrate troops on the ____________. a. Western front c. Northern fro
Tresset [83]

Answer: I am pretty sure it was the Eastern front. I hope this helps.

6 0
3 years ago
What was a result of the “Compromise of 1877”? A. It brought an end to Reconstruction. B. It brought an end to Jim Crow laws in
finlep [7]
The answer would be a brought an end to the reconstruction

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did new technologies change people’s perspective about war? I need it today, please
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Technologies changed people's perspective about war because thanks to the developing of the communication and social media we are allowed to know more about social and political issues.

The real key about the new technologies is the possibility to be informed of certain things that we care about.

The amount of information we can get from the Internet is amazing, of course we always should check in real web sites, with good quality articles. We can investigate and know what is the real conflict - and the real interests - between two or more territories and the continuous suffering of people who lives in those places where war is happening.    


3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1605, Roman Catholic-inspired Guy Fawkes conspired against the king and Parliament. His plan was known as the .
    10·2 answers
  • How did political systems in the American colonies change during the modern era ?
    12·2 answers
  • 1. Who would be most likely to examine the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?
    9·2 answers
  • 3. How did the Protestant Reformation lead to the increase of intellectual freedom that leads to
    6·1 answer
  • The first Europeans to explore America were probably the Vikings of Norway.<br><br> True<br> False
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the most accurate comparison of Americans and Europeans in the area of Oklahoma?
    10·1 answer
  • During the Columbian Exchange slaves were imported (brought to) the Americas from the continent of??
    12·2 answers
  • Explain the relationship between military conflict nationalism ​
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the U.S. want to purchase California from Mexico?
    13·2 answers
  • Can someone please write me a persuasive essay about the Boston tea party
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!