If I was the writer, standing in the shoes of an elephant, I'd start off describing my peaceful life. I'd describe how we were peaceful mammals. We (Meaning the elephant and his elephant friends and family) always went about our business and did what was needed to live. Poachers came to hunt us down quite often, just because our skin was considered rare amongst the African People, they would kill us. Describe how the semi humane people would not kill the elephant, but buy the skin from the seller. These killers, the poachers often resurfaced as wealthy, heartless men. Although most people consider it a "small issue" it is killing us, we are drifting to extinction if this doesn't stop, and soon. Write about how you think life might be, if poachers were not a thing.
I am pretty sure that if you embellish upon this story and extent it enough. This will surely meet your story's character standard of 300-500 characters.
-Hope this helped
Sincerely,
xPain
Answer:
The whole town now feels that Wickham is a terrible person.
Explanation:
"Pride and Prejudice" is one of the most famous novels by English author Jane Austen (1775-1817). It develops themes concerning love, differences in class and status, and how influential society could be over people's lives.
Mr. Wickham, at the beginning of the novel, was seen by all as the most charming of young men. The whole town of Meryton spoke well of his manners, and several young girls were in love with him. However,<u> in chapter 48, everything changes. After Wickham elopes with Lydia Bennet, which was an awful thing to do in the past, the town of Meryton begins to speak ill of him. Everyone now has some complaint, especially concerning Wickham's debts. And everyone now says they always knew he was not as good a person as he seemed to be.</u>
The baker donated a large box of bread to the fundraiser
Answer:
C. It suggests that readers have fun exploring poetry.
The answer is:
B. Changing the meaning of the quotation by changing the context.
Because changing the meaning of the quotation by changing the context constitutes a case of intellectual dishonesty.