1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frutty [35]
3 years ago
13

Pls halp :( need halp asap

English
2 answers:
Firdavs [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Well I dont know how to answer since I didn't read the article so I will just tell you what it means :) SO basically it wants you to tell it what you thought of it and how different your thoughts were from the actual article. So say if it was about a cow and you thought the cow would be black and white but instead it was blue- describe how different you thought it was. Lol don't mind that example-

Explanation:

GrogVix [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Conventional quantum field theories work well in describing the results of experiments at high-energy particle smashers such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where the Higgs was discovered, which probe matter at its smallest scales. But if you want to understand how things work in many less esoteric situations – how electrons move or don’t move through a solid material and so make a material a metal, an insulator or a semiconductor, for example – things get even more complex.

The billions upon billions of interactions in these crowded environments require the development of “effective field theories” that gloss over some of the gory details. The difficulty in constructing such theories is why many important questions in solid-state physics remain unresolved – for instance why at low temperatures some materials are superconductors that allow current without electrical resistance, and why we can’t get this trick to work at room temperature.

But beneath all these practical problems lies a huge quantum mystery. At a basic level, quantum physics predicts very strange things about how matter works that are completely at odds with how things seem to work in the real world. Quantum particles can behave like particles, located in a single place; or they can act like waves, distributed all over space or in several places at once. How they appear seems to depend on how we choose to measure them, and before we measure they seem to have no definite properties at all – leading us to a fundamental conundrum about the nature of basic reality.

This fuzziness leads to apparent paradoxes such as Schrödinger’s cat, in which thanks to an uncertain quantum process a cat is left dead and alive at the same time. But that’s not all. Quantum particles also seem to be able to affect each other instantaneously even when they are far away from each other. This truly bamboozling phenomenon is known as entanglement, or, in a phrase coined by Einstein (a great critic of quantum theory), “spooky action at a distance”. Such quantum powers are completely foreign to us, yet are the basis of emerging technologies such as ultra-secure quantum cryptography and ultra-powerful quantum computing.

But as to what it all means, no one knows. Some people think we must just accept that quantum physics explains the material world in terms we find impossible to square with our experience in the larger, “classical” world. Others think there must be some better, more intuitive theory out there that we’ve yet to discover.

In all this, there are several elephants in the room. For a start, there’s a fourth fundamental force of nature that so far quantum theory has been unable to explain. Gravity remains the territory of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, a firmly non-quantum theory that doesn’t even involve particles. Intensive efforts over decades to bring gravity under the quantum umbrella and so explain all of fundamental physics within one “theory of everything” have come to nothing.

Meanwhile cosmological measurements indicate that over 95 per cent of the universe consists of dark matter and dark energy, stuffs for which we currently have no explanation within the standard model, and conundrums such as the extent of the role of quantum physics in the messy workings of life remain unexplained. The world is at some level quantum – but whether quantum physics is the last word about the world remains an open question.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/definition/quantum-physics/#ixzz6v8lQ13km

Explanation:

You might be interested in
(1) I have always enjoyed nature and being outdoors. (2) Last fall I was taking one of my regular nature hikes, when I thought a
Artemon [7]

Answer:

A) sentences 6 and 7

Explanation:

Sentences "I learned how to focus my camera" and "I also learned how to choose what to photograph" have identical subjects (I) and verbs (learned). Therefore, it would be better to combine them to improve the flow of the narrative: I learned how to focus my camera and also how to choose what to photograph.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which technique does the author used to engage the reader?
weeeeeb [17]

make an emotional connection Making an emotional connection through your writing is another technique writers use to engage readers.

Whether your writing angers people, scares them, or strikes a chord with them, connecting on an emotional level is an important key to reader engagement. Hook your readers.

Find your voice.

Make your article easy to read.

Use visuals.

Know what you are talking about.

Make it personal.

Be relatable, not pretentious.

Give your readers what you promised.

There are many different types of hooks, but a strong hook will grab readers, usually throwing them into the middle of a dramatic action or raising curiosity about an intriguing character, unusual situation, or important question. They can provide a personal view of a topic. . It is through these insights that anecdotes emotionally engage readers and foster a sense of empathy with the writer's opinion.

To learn more about  engage please click on below link

brainly.com/question/8081362

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
CTSOs are especially helpful for people who are applying for which things? Check all that apply. employment military service spo
mafiozo [28]

CTSOs are especially helpful for people who are applying for:

  • employment
  • military service
  • college

These answers are correct because they relate to careers that you can apply for.

CTSO stand for "Career and Technical Student Organization", and they are places where primarily students can learn about their future jobs and careers.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does hawthorne portray nature in the story? people should be in harmony with nature. nature is something to be feared. natur
elena-s [515]
He thinks it's a butiful thing apart of this world
8 0
3 years ago
A verb that tells only what the subject does is a(n) ____________ verb; example:
Alex17521 [72]
Hm, I will ask my dad this and I will report back to you!!!!
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The tone of your workplace writing should be _______ to avoid confusing the reader. A. serious B. vague C. consistent D. friendl
    15·1 answer
  • A group of words without a verb acting as the subject of a sentence is a(n) _____.
    8·2 answers
  • please answer, don't get mad, I know this isn't a math question or anything, but am I a burdon? I meet someone who eventually be
    6·2 answers
  • 6. Walking is not the most exciting form of exercise a person can take on for fitness. Yet it is low impact and requires no fanc
    11·1 answer
  • Write one paragraph evaluating the effectiveness of
    9·2 answers
  • Guys plzz answer this question of environmental science​
    5·1 answer
  • How do you say “Holy cow” in French? The fastest thing in France may just be the fastest ground transportation in the world. The
    13·1 answer
  • What’s the literary device
    7·1 answer
  • 25 POINTS!!
    10·1 answer
  • Explain you let every one know that people should strive to be like them.​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!