1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frutty [35]
3 years ago
13

Pls halp :( need halp asap

English
2 answers:
Firdavs [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Well I dont know how to answer since I didn't read the article so I will just tell you what it means :) SO basically it wants you to tell it what you thought of it and how different your thoughts were from the actual article. So say if it was about a cow and you thought the cow would be black and white but instead it was blue- describe how different you thought it was. Lol don't mind that example-

Explanation:

GrogVix [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Conventional quantum field theories work well in describing the results of experiments at high-energy particle smashers such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where the Higgs was discovered, which probe matter at its smallest scales. But if you want to understand how things work in many less esoteric situations – how electrons move or don’t move through a solid material and so make a material a metal, an insulator or a semiconductor, for example – things get even more complex.

The billions upon billions of interactions in these crowded environments require the development of “effective field theories” that gloss over some of the gory details. The difficulty in constructing such theories is why many important questions in solid-state physics remain unresolved – for instance why at low temperatures some materials are superconductors that allow current without electrical resistance, and why we can’t get this trick to work at room temperature.

But beneath all these practical problems lies a huge quantum mystery. At a basic level, quantum physics predicts very strange things about how matter works that are completely at odds with how things seem to work in the real world. Quantum particles can behave like particles, located in a single place; or they can act like waves, distributed all over space or in several places at once. How they appear seems to depend on how we choose to measure them, and before we measure they seem to have no definite properties at all – leading us to a fundamental conundrum about the nature of basic reality.

This fuzziness leads to apparent paradoxes such as Schrödinger’s cat, in which thanks to an uncertain quantum process a cat is left dead and alive at the same time. But that’s not all. Quantum particles also seem to be able to affect each other instantaneously even when they are far away from each other. This truly bamboozling phenomenon is known as entanglement, or, in a phrase coined by Einstein (a great critic of quantum theory), “spooky action at a distance”. Such quantum powers are completely foreign to us, yet are the basis of emerging technologies such as ultra-secure quantum cryptography and ultra-powerful quantum computing.

But as to what it all means, no one knows. Some people think we must just accept that quantum physics explains the material world in terms we find impossible to square with our experience in the larger, “classical” world. Others think there must be some better, more intuitive theory out there that we’ve yet to discover.

In all this, there are several elephants in the room. For a start, there’s a fourth fundamental force of nature that so far quantum theory has been unable to explain. Gravity remains the territory of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, a firmly non-quantum theory that doesn’t even involve particles. Intensive efforts over decades to bring gravity under the quantum umbrella and so explain all of fundamental physics within one “theory of everything” have come to nothing.

Meanwhile cosmological measurements indicate that over 95 per cent of the universe consists of dark matter and dark energy, stuffs for which we currently have no explanation within the standard model, and conundrums such as the extent of the role of quantum physics in the messy workings of life remain unexplained. The world is at some level quantum – but whether quantum physics is the last word about the world remains an open question.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/definition/quantum-physics/#ixzz6v8lQ13km

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Please help me. 10 points.
BigorU [14]

Answer:

C. A swelling movement sweeping others in a shared direction

Explanation:

This can be understood in two ways. One, by understanding the statement within its context and then trying to understand what the word could mean; and second, with the help of substituting the meaning of the word, adjusted in the original sentence, and relating it with the context to see if it makes sense.

Understanding the Context

The sentence talks about a popular opinion being effectively changed. which remained as it was for a long time, since the change was 'long overdue.' Clearly it requires a massive force to move or even budge a long established and popular opinion, and that massive force can be compared to the force that a wave (literal meaning implied) can exert, sweeping away all that comes before it, in its own direction. Option C matches this description of the wave, and hence is the correct answer.

Substituting the Meaning

"Both effectively changed the popular opinion about emotional issues for their countries and brought in a swelling movement sweeping others in a shared direction of change that was long overdue."

Here, we can observe that the meaning remains the same and makes sense, and hence C is the correct option.

6 0
3 years ago
What is a synonym for selfless?
katrin [286]
Self-denying, self-sacrificing,un-selfish
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which words make up the compound direct object in the sentence? From the top of the lighthouse, we saw three islands and five sa
victus00 [196]
D. We, is the answer you are looking for. Compound direct object is a noun or phrase and the recipient.
4 0
4 years ago
The proofreading step of the writing process comes before which step?
Digiron [165]

The proofreading step of the writing process comes before the final printing. In this step, grammar, spelling and correct order of ideas and presentation are checked

4 0
3 years ago
In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefitting the community, including the
mihalych1998 [28]
I believe the answer would be A as it is the only one that indicates a relevance to the question. B and C are more opinions or just statements and D. Is more about books being checked out than being read to children.

I hope this helps you! Good luck!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does Romeo embody the ideal of love? What values does he seem to hold? How do those values put him in contrast with Tybalt a
    5·1 answer
  • A vague pronoun is one whose reference is unclear. Choose the sentence that contains a vague pronoun. A) Bismarck was a hero to
    8·2 answers
  • In what ways do you expand your English vocabulary?
    11·1 answer
  • In The Necklace, which character stated, "You never go out, and this is such a fine opportunity." a)Madame Loisel b)Madame Fores
    8·2 answers
  • Rohini is ____ B.A. pass student (a/an/the)​
    14·1 answer
  • Dunbar's number is a:
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone complete the story?<br> i want ideas
    11·2 answers
  • According to the selection, black bears go up trees to
    7·1 answer
  • Read the passage.
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think Mark Twain uses a young boy as the main character and narrator of the novel? Your response should
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!