Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer:
I agree.
Explanation:
Free writing represents the free presentation of thoughts and ideas within a text. In this case, an author has the complete ability to gather thoughts, transform them into words and put them on paper without worrying about revising or editing what was written because his thoughts are being expressed freely and outside standards of language and grammar. In this way, we can agree with Elbow's statement, because free writing is an exercise in bringing together the process of producing words and putting them on the page.
Thanks I really needed this you are the best
