Answer:
<h3>Option B is the correct answer .☺☺</h3>
Explanation:
<h2> As it contains that which is (relative clause).</h2>
C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had any thing to do with her.
In Option C, Paine is stating that America would actually have been better off if it was not controlled by Britain. He says that being under British control actually hindered America's progress and kept it from flourishing even more. Options A and B both give arguments for America needing Britain in order to thrive. In Option A it states that a connection with Britain is important for America to maintain its happiness. In Option B it compares America to a child. It states that if a child can survive on milk alone then it should never have meat. Therefore America should only need Britain. We can tell Paine sees this as preposterous, but this initial idea does not support the claim. Option D shows how America will always have commerce but Britain is only concerned with eating. This alone is not enough for strong evidence.
The question above wants to analyze your reading and writing ability through a summary. For that reason, I can't write the summary for you, but I'll show you how to write it.
First, you should know that a summary is a short, straightforward text that presents only the main points of another text.
Therefore, to write a summary of Nguyen Thi Do's experiences, you must read the text where she presents these experiences.
After this reading, you can write your summary of the following form:
- Show the main experiences of Nguyen Thi Do.
- Show the feeling she had during those moments.
- Show how it is meaningful to the text.
You can find out more about how to make a summary at the link below:
brainly.com/question/24839707
Answer:
D. It's more surprising that Wisdom hatched a chick at age 68 than it is that she has lived to be 68 years old.
Explanation:
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that only you can complete. However, we are still able to provide some guidance that can help you complete your work.
In her "Letter to Napoleon III," Elizabeth Barrett Browning employs several rhetorical strategies to urge Napoleon III to forgive the author Victor Hugo and free him from his imprisonment.
Browning uses ethos when she presents herself as a fair person. Ethos refers to an appeal to credibility, and Browning employs it when she agrees with Napoleon about the wrong nature of Victor Hugo's actions. She also employs a paradox to force Napoleon to pay close attention to her argument. The paradox is that, even though Victor Hugo acted against the emperor, he deserves to be free. Browning employs anaphora when she repeats the phrase "what touches you" in order to convince Napoleon of the importance of his reputation. Finally, she uses pathos (an appeal to emotion) when she highlights how grateful and admiring Napoleon's subjects will be if he pardons Victor Hugo.
